Paper · 1975 · South African Forestry Journal

A First Account of Profits at Harvesting as a Result of Fertilizing Eucalyptus grandis at Time of Planting in Southern Africa

A. P.G. Schönau; M. Pennefather

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Results at harvesting are described of two comprehensive NPK fertilizer experiments with E. grandis on sites previously under wattle in the Natal Midlands. The experimental sites differ considerably in respect of physiography, climate, and soil. The difference in climate and soil are clearly evident from the respective analyses of soil samples from the sites, one soil of a dystrophic series belonging to the Griffin form, and the other a mesotrophic series of the Hutton form. Except in one instance, nitrogen application showed no significant response, which is expected on these nitrogen-enriched soils of old wattle plantations. There is a tendency, which in one instance was significant, that nitrogen has a depressive effect on E. grandis, but this is ascribed to burning the transplants when the fertilizer is too concentrated and applied too close to the trees. Superphosphate application on these sites gives highly profitable results, the additional net profit per ha being nearly R400 on the better site and at least R35 on the poorer site. The optimum application rate on the better site is not more than 130 g superphosphate (8,3% P) per tree, while the optimum rate on the poorer site might be as high as 260 g. Significant responses to potash application are limited to mesotrophic soils and are of a curvilinear nature. This last phenomenon especially is difficult to explain, but is known to have occurred elsewhere.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application generally showed no significant response.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no significant responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except in one instance, nitrogen application showed no significant response, which is expected on these nitrogen-enriched soils of old wattle plantations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen tended to depress Eucalyptus, significantly in one instance.

Taxon
E. grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
E. grandise0
Direction
depressive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a tendency, which in one instance was significant, that nitrogen has a depressive effect on E. grandis, but this is ascribed to burning the transplants when the fertilizer is too concentrated and applied too close to the trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–879 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the depressive nitrogen response to transplant burning from concentrated fertilizer placed too close.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
burning the transplantse0
Qualifier
too concentrated and applied too close to the treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but this is ascribed to burning the transplants when the fertilizer is too concentrated and applied too close to the trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased net profit by nearly R400 per hectare on the better site.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
Superphosphate applicatione0
Outcome
additional net profit per hae0
Direction
additionale0
Value
nearly R400e0
Setting
better sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superphosphate application on these sites gives highly profitable results, the additional net profit per ha being nearly R400 on the better site and at least R35 on the poorer site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased net profit by at least R35 per hectare on the poorer site.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
Superphosphate applicatione0
Outcome
additional net profit per hae0
Direction
additionale0
Value
at least R35e0
Setting
poorer sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superphosphate application on these sites gives highly profitable results, the additional net profit per ha being nearly R400 on the better site and at least R35 on the poorer site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum superphosphate rate on the better site was no more than 130 g per tree.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Outcome
optimum application ratee0
Direction
not more thane0
Value
130 g superphosphate (8,3% P) per treee0
Setting
better sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum application rate on the better site is not more than 130 g superphosphate (8,3% P) per tree, while the optimum rate on the poorer site might be as high as 260 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum superphosphate rate on the poorer site might reach 260 g.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Outcome
optimum ratee0
Direction
as high ase0
Value
260 ge0
Setting
poorer sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum application rate on the better site is not more than 130 g superphosphate (8,3% P) per tree, while the optimum rate on the poorer site might be as high as 260 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash gave significant curvilinear responses only on mesotrophic soils.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
potash applicatione0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
curvilinear naturee0
Setting
mesotrophic soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant responses to potash application are limited to mesotrophic soils and are of a curvilinear nature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–86 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.