Paper · 2008 · Journal of Basic Microbiology

Characterization of metal‐resistant plant‐growth promoting Bacillus weihenstephanensis isolated from serpentine soil in Portugal

Mani Rajkumar; Ying Ma; Helena Freitas

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
115
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A metal-resistant bacterial strain SM3 isolated from a serpentine soil in the north-east of Portugal was characterized as Bacillus weihenstephanensis based on the morphological and biochemical characteristics and on the comparative analysis of the partial 16S ribosomal DNA sequence. Bacillus weihenstephanensis SM3 showed a high degree of resistance to nickel (1500 mg l(-1)), copper (500 mg l(-1)) and zinc (700 mg l(-1)) and also to antibiotics (ampicillin, penicillin, kanamycin and streptomycin). Strain SM3 has also exhibited the capability of solubilizing phosphate and producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) both in the absence and in the presence of metals (Ni, Cu and Zn). A pot experiment was conducted to elucidate the effects of strain SM3 on plant growth and uptake of Ni, Cu or Zn by Helianthus annuus. Inoculation with strain SM3 increased the shoot and root biomass of H. annuus grown in both non-contaminated and contaminated soil. Furthermore, strain SM3 increased the accumulation of Cu and Zn in the root and shoot systems. A batch experiment was also conducted to assess the metal mobilization potential of strain SM3 in soil. Inoculation with this strain increased the concentrations of water soluble Ni, Cu and Zn in soil. Metal solubilization by this bacterial strain may be an important process to promote the uptake of heavy metals by plants. This study elucidates the multifarious role of strain SM3 in plant growth promotion and its metal mobilizing potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM3 inoculation increased sunflower shoot and root biomass in both soil conditions.

Taxon
H. annuusHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Inoculation with strain SM3e0
Interactor
strain SM3e0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both non-contaminated and contaminated soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with strain SM3 increased the shoot and root biomass of H. annuus grown in both non-contaminated and contaminated soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM3 increased Cu accumulation in roots and shoots.

Taxon
H. annuusHelianthus annuuse1
Organ / stage
root and shoot systemse0
Treatment
strain SM3e0
Interactor
strain SM3e0symbiont
Outcome
accumulation of Cue0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain SM3 increased the accumulation of Cu and Zn in the root and shoot systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with strain SM3 increased the shoot and root biomass of H. annuus grown in both non-contaminated and contaminated soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM3 increased Zn accumulation in roots and shoots.

Taxon
H. annuusHelianthus annuuse1
Organ / stage
root and shoot systemse0
Treatment
strain SM3e0
Interactor
strain SM3e0symbiont
Outcome
accumulation of Cu and Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain SM3 increased the accumulation of Cu and Zn in the root and shoot systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with strain SM3 increased the shoot and root biomass of H. annuus grown in both non-contaminated and contaminated soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM3 increased water soluble soil Ni, Cu and Zn.

Taxon
H. annuusHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Inoculation with this straine0
Outcome
concentrations of water soluble Ni, Cu and Zn in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with this strain increased the concentrations of water soluble Ni, Cu and Zn in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant‐growth promoting Bacillus weihenstephanensis isolated from serpentine soil in Portugal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with strain SM3 increased the shoot and root biomass of H. annuus grown in both non-contaminated and contaminated soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 54 positive, 8 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.