Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

COMPARISON OF CRITICAL NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS WITH DRIS FOR ASSESSING NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES OF POTATOES ON IRRIGATED CHERNOZEMIC SOILS

D. C. MacKAY; T. ENTZ; J. M. CAREFOOT; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Best fit quadratic response curves relating tuber yields with fertilizer treatment rates from a 3-yr 4 × 4 factorial field experiment provided the bases for diagnosing nutrient deficiencies of N and P. These curves were compared with similar response curves of leaf nutrient concentrations and for deficiency indices calculated by the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). Critical nutrient concentrations (CNCs) of 5.93 and 5.44% of N and 0.47 and 0.35% of P were associated with estimated yield decrements of < 5% and > 15% of the maxima. Corresponding DRIS indices were −2.1 and −6.7 for N and −10 and −26 for P. Although there were no yield responses to applied K in 10 field experiments, 4 and 3% were selected as CNCs possibly indicative of K-supplying potential. Corresponding DRIS values were 5.6 and −17. When these CNC values were applied to 372 commercial fields sampled over an 8-yr period, there were 30, 44, and 12% in the top class for N, P, and K, respectively, while 34, 8, and 7% were in the bottom deficiency class. The DRIS system placed 41, 76, and 76% of the fields in the same deficiency classes for N, P, and K, respectively, but only 13, 0, and 0% differed by more than one class. There appeared to be limited potential advantages for the DRIS method of diagnosis.Key words: Solanum tuberosum L., leaf analysis, fertilizer rates, potato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical N concentrations of 5.93 and 5.44% corresponded to yield decrements below 5% and above 15%.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
Critical nutrient concentrations (CNCs)e0
Value
5.93 and 5.44%e0
Qualifier
estimated yield decrements of < 5% and > 15% of the maximae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Critical nutrient concentrations (CNCs) of 5.93 and 5.44% of N and 0.47 and 0.35% of P were associated with estimated yield decrements of < 5% and > 15% of the maxima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical P concentrations of 0.47 and 0.35% corresponded to yield decrements below 5% and above 15%.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
Critical nutrient concentrationse1
Value
0.47 and 0.35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.47 and 0.35% of P were associated with estimated yield decrements of < 5% and > 15% of the maxima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–556 · show in text ↑
e1

“Critical nutrient concentrations (CNCs) of 5.93 and 5.44% of N and 0.47 and 0.35% of P were associated with estimated yield decrements of < 5% and > 15% of the maxima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corresponding DRIS indices were −2.1 and −6.7 for N.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
DRIS indicese0
Value
−2.1 and −6.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding DRIS indices were −2.1 and −6.7 for N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corresponding DRIS indices were −10 and −26 for P.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
DRIS indicese1
Value
−10 and −26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“−10 and −26 for P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corresponding DRIS indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied K produced no yield response in 10 field experiments.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
applied Ke0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Direction
noe0
Value
10 field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no yield responses to applied K in 10 field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four and 3% were selected as critical K concentrations indicative of K supply.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
CNCse0
Value
4 and 3%e0
Qualifier
possibly indicative of K-supplying potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 and 3% were selected as CNCs possibly indicative of K-supplying potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corresponding K DRIS values were 5.6 and −17.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
DRIS valuese0
Value
5.6 and −17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding DRIS values were 5.6 and −17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CNC placed 30, 44 and 12% of fields in the top N, P and K classes, respectively.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
top class for N, P, and Ke0
Value
30, 44, and 12%e0
Qualifier
372 commercial fieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were 30, 44, and 12% in the top class for N, P, and K, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“these CNC values were applied to 372 commercial fields sampled over an 8-yr period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CNC placed 34, 8 and 7% of fields in the bottom N, P and K deficiency classes.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
bottom deficiency classe0
Value
34, 8, and 7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34, 8, and 7% were in the bottom deficiency class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRIS matched CNC deficiency classes for 41, 76 and 76% of N, P and K fields.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
same deficiency classes for N, P, and Ke0
Value
41, 76, and 76%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DRIS system placed 41, 76, and 76% of the fields in the same deficiency classes for N, P, and K, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 13, 0 and 0% of N, P and K fields differed by more than one deficiency class between methods.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
differed by more than one classe0
Value
13, 0, and 0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 13, 0, and 0% differed by more than one class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRIS appeared to offer limited diagnostic advantage.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
limited potential advantages for the DRIS method of diagnosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There appeared to be limited potential advantages for the DRIS method of diagnosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

69 papers: 61 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.