Paper · 1986 · Annals of Applied Biology

The phylloplane microflora of ripening wheat and effect of late fungicide applications

N. MAGAN; J. LACEY

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Flag leaves and ears of spring wheat cv. Timmo (in 1980) and winter wheat cv. Maris Huntsman in 1981 and 1982 were colonised by a variety of micro‐organisms whose numbers increased rapidly between anthesis and harvest. The predominant mycoflora were yeasts, yeast‐like fungi and filamentous fungi which included Cladosporium spp., Verticillium lecanii, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium spp. and Epicoccum nigrum. Although similar species were isolated, their relative abundance on flag leaves and ears differed. The fungicide captafol was most effective as a protectant and significantly decreased populations of fungi on flag leaves and ears for 6 and 4 wk respectively, compared to untreated controls. Benomyl and Delsene M (carbendazim + maneb) were the most effective of the systemic sprays and formulations. In general, fungicides affected populations of yeasts, yeast‐like fungi and Cladosporium spp. most while Alternaria was tolerant of all treatments. Yields of winter wheat were increased in two seasons by an average 0–2 t ha ‐1 (2–4%) following a single late fungicide treatment at G.S. 50 or 60 and 0–41 t ha ‐1 (5‐1%) when this was combined with an early spray against foliar diseases (G.S. 38–40). Individual treatments increased yield by up to 12% with little difference between applications at G.S. 50 or 60. The yield benefit came mainly from increased 1000‐grain weights. Germination of the treated grain was increased only slightly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microorganism numbers on wheat flag leaves and ears increased rapidly between anthesis and harvest.

Organ / stage
Flag leaves and earse0
Outcome
micro‐organisms whose numberse0
Direction
increased rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flag leaves and ears of spring wheat cv. Timmo (in 1980) and winter wheat cv. Maris Huntsman in 1981 and 1982 were colonised by a variety of micro‐organisms whose numbers increased rapidly between anthesis and harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predominant wheat mycoflora were yeasts, yeast-like fungi and filamentous fungi.

Outcome
predominant mycoflorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predominant mycoflora were yeasts, yeast‐like fungi and filamentous fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance of phylloplane species differed between flag leaves and ears.

Organ / stage
flag leaves and earse0
Outcome
relative abundancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their relative abundance on flag leaves and ears differed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Captafol significantly decreased fungal populations on flag leaves and ears compared with untreated controls.

Treatment
captafole0
Outcome
populations of fungie0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
6 and 4 wke0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide captafol was most effective as a protectant and significantly decreased populations of fungi on flag leaves and ears for 6 and 4 wk respectively, compared to untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl and Delsene M were the most effective systemic sprays.

Outcome
most effective of the systemic sprays and formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benomyl and Delsene M (carbendazim + maneb) were the most effective of the systemic sprays and formulations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides affected yeasts, yeast-like fungi and Cladosporium populations most.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
populations of yeasts, yeast‐like fungi and Cladosporium spp.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides affected populations of yeasts, yeast‐like fungi and Cladosporium spp. most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria was tolerant of all fungicide treatments.

Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae0pathogen
Outcome
Alternaria was tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria was tolerant of all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single late fungicide treatment increased winter wheat yield in two seasons.

Treatment
single late fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0–2 t ha ‐1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of winter wheat were increased in two seasons by an average 0–2 t ha ‐1 (2–4%) following a single late fungicide treatment at G.S. 50 or 60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining late treatment with an early foliar disease spray increased winter wheat yield.

Treatment
early spray against foliar diseasese0
Outcome
0–41 t ha ‐1e0
Value
0–41 t ha ‐1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0–41 t ha ‐1 (5‐1%) when this was combined with an early spray against foliar diseases (G.S. 38–40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual fungicide treatments increased yield by up to 12%, with little difference between G.S. 50 and 60.

Treatment
Individual treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 12%e0
Comparator
applications at G.S. 50 or 60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual treatments increased yield by up to 12% with little difference between applications at G.S. 50 or 60.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield benefit came mainly from greater 1000-grain weight.

Outcome
1000‐grain weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield benefit came mainly from increased 1000‐grain weights.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of treated grain increased only slightly.

Treatment
treated graine0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of the treated grain was increased only slightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑

fungicide · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.