Paper · 2008 · Grass and Forage Science

Effects of different rates and timing of application of nitrogen as slurry and mineral fertilizer on yield of herbage and nitrate‐leaching potential of a maize/Italian ryegrass cropping system in north‐west Portugal

H. Trindade; J. Coutinho; S. Jarvis; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Efficient use of cattle‐slurry to avoid nitrogen (N) leaching and other losses is important in designing intensive dairy systems to minimize pollution of air and water. The response in dry‐matter (DM) yield of herbage and nitrate‐leaching potential to different rates and timing of application of N as cattle slurry and/or mineral fertilizer in a double‐cropping system producing maize ( Zea mays L.) silage and Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.) was investigated in north‐west Portugal. Nine treatments with different rates and combinations of cattle slurry, and with or without mineral‐N fertilizer, applied at sowing and as a top‐dressing to both crops, were tested and measurements were made of DM yield of herbage, N concentration of herbage, uptake of N by herbage and amounts of residual soil nitrate‐N to a depth of 1 m, in a 3‐year experiment. Regression analysis showed that the application of 150 and 100 kg of available N ha −1 to maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively, resulted in 0·95 of maximum DM yields of herbage and 0·90 of maximum N uptake by herbage. Residual amounts of nitrate‐N in soil after maize ranged from 48 to 278 kg N ha −1 with an exponential increase in response to the amount of N applied; there were higher values of nitrate‐leaching potential when mineral‐N fertilizer was applied. The results suggest that it is possible in highly productive maize/Italian ryegrass systems to obtain high DM yields of herbage for maize silage and Italian ryegrass herbage with minimal leaching losses by using slurry exclusively at annual rates of up to 250 kg available N ha −1 (equivalent to 480 kg total N ha −1 ) in three applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 150 kg available N per hectare to maize produced 95% of maximum herbage dry matter yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
150e0
Outcome
DM yields of herbagee0
Value
0·95e0
Comparator
maximume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 150 and 100 kg of available N ha −1 to maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively, resulted in 0·95 of maximum DM yields of herbage and 0·90 of maximum N uptake by herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 100 kg available N per hectare to Italian ryegrass produced 95% of maximum herbage dry matter yield.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume0
Treatment
100 kg of available N ha −1e0
Outcome
DM yields of herbagee0
Value
0·95e0
Comparator
maximume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 150 and 100 kg of available N ha −1 to maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively, resulted in 0·95 of maximum DM yields of herbage and 0·90 of maximum N uptake by herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported nitrogen application rates produced 90% of maximum herbage nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
maize and Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumZea mayse0
Treatment
150 and 100 kg of available N ha −1e0
Outcome
N uptake by herbagee0
Value
0·90e0
Comparator
maximume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 150 and 100 kg of available N ha −1 to maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively, resulted in 0·95 of maximum DM yields of herbage and 0·90 of maximum N uptake by herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1091 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil nitrate after maize ranged from 48 to 278 kg N per hectare and rose exponentially with applied nitrogen.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
amount of N appliede0
Outcome
Residual amounts of nitrate‐N in soil after maizee0
Direction
exponential increasee0
Value
48 to 278 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual amounts of nitrate‐N in soil after maize ranged from 48 to 278 kg N ha −1 with an exponential increase in response to the amount of N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen fertilizer produced higher nitrate leaching potential.

Taxon
maize/Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumZea mayst0
Treatment
mineral‐N fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrate‐leaching potentiale0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were higher values of nitrate‐leaching potential when mineral‐N fertilizer was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/Italian ryegrass cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–192 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend slurry alone at annual rates up to 250 kg available N per hectare, in three applications, to obtain high herbage yield with minimal leaching.

Taxon
maize silage and Italian ryegrass herbagee0
Outcome
using slurry exclusively at annual rates of up to 250 kg available N ha −1e0
Qualifier
in three applicationse0

Verbatim

e0

“obtain high DM yields of herbage for maize silage and Italian ryegrass herbage with minimal leaching losses by using slurry exclusively at annual rates of up to 250 kg available N ha −1 (equivalent to 480 kg total N ha −1 ) in three applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1679 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.