Paper · 2013 · PLoS ONE

Drought and Root Herbivory Interact to Alter the Response of Above-Ground Parasitoids to Aphid Infested Plants and Associated Plant Volatile Signals

Muhammad Tariq; Denis J. Wright; Toby J. A. Bruce; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Multitrophic interactions are likely to be altered by climate change but there is little empirical evidence relating the responses of herbivores and parasitoids to abiotic factors. Here we investigated the effects of drought on an above/below-ground system comprising a generalist and a specialist aphid species (foliar herbivores), their parasitoids, and a dipteran species (root herbivore).We tested the hypotheses that: (1) high levels of drought stress and below-ground herbivory interact to reduce the performance of parasitoids developing in aphids; (2) drought stress and root herbivory change the profile of volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) emitted by the host plant; (3) parasitoids avoid ovipositing in aphids feeding on plants under drought stress and root herbivory. We examined the effect of drought, with and without root herbivory, on the olfactory response of parasitoids (preference), plant volatile emissions, parasitism success (performance), and the effect of drought on root herbivory. Under drought, percentage parasitism of aphids was reduced by about 40-55% compared with well watered plants. There was a significant interaction between drought and root herbivory on the efficacy of the two parasitoid species, drought stress partially reversing the negative effect of root herbivory on percent parasitism. In the absence of drought, root herbivory significantly reduced the performance (e.g. fecundity) of both parasitoid species developing in foliar herbivores. Plant emissions of VOCs were reduced by drought and root herbivores, and in olfactometer experiments parasitoids preferred the odour from well-watered plants compared with other treatments. The present work demonstrates that drought stress can change the outcome of interactions between herbivores feeding above- and below-ground and their parasitoids, mediated by changes in the chemical signals from plants to parasitoids. This provides a new insight into how the structure of terrestrial communities may be affected by drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced aphid parasitism by about 40-55% relative to well watered plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
droughte0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
percentage parasitism of aphidse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 40-55%e0
Comparator
well watered plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought, percentage parasitism of aphids was reduced by about 40-55% compared with well watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought partly reversed the negative effect of root herbivory on parasitism.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Interactor
parasitoid speciese0other
Outcome
percent parasitisme0
Direction
partially reversinge0
Comparator
root herbivorye0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant interaction between drought and root herbivory on the efficacy of the two parasitoid species, drought stress partially reversing the negative effect of root herbivory on percent parasitism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid Infested Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without drought, root herbivory reduced parasitoid fecundity.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
root herbivorye0
Interactor
parasitoid speciese0other
Outcome
fecundity) of both parasitoid speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of drought, root herbivory significantly reduced the performance (e.g. fecundity) of both parasitoid species developing in foliar herbivores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid Infested Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced plant VOC emissions.

Taxon
Plante0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Plant emissions of VOCse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant emissions of VOCs were reduced by drought and root herbivores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root herbivores reduced plant VOC emissions.

Taxon
Plante0
Treatment
root herbivorese0
Interactor
root herbivorese0herbivore
Outcome
Plant emissions of VOCse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant emissions of VOCs were reduced by drought and root herbivores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoids preferred odour from well-watered plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
parasitoidse0other
Outcome
parasitoids preferred the odour from well-watered plantse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“in olfactometer experiments parasitoids preferred the odour from well-watered plants compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1677 · show in text ↑

grazing · pest · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.