Paper · 2012 · New Disease Reports

First report of a tospovirus in a commercial crop of Cape gooseberry in Brazil

M. Eiras; I.F.D. Costa; A.L.R. Chaves; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Viruses from the genus Tospovirus (family Bunyaviridae) are widespread in the Americas, where the following species have been reported: Tomato chlorotic spot virus (TCSV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV), Chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus (CSNV), Zucchini lethal chlorosis virus (ZLCV), Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV), Iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) (Jones, 2005), Alstroemeria necrotic streak virus (ANSV), Melon severe mosaic virus (MeSMV) and Bean necrotic mosaic virus (BeNMV) (Ciuffo et al., 2009; Hassani-Mehraban et al., 2010; Oliveira et al., 2011). This work describes the identification of a virus isolated from a commercial crop of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) in October 2009 in Santa Maria, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The disease was identified in a 5 ha cultivated area, where 100% of the plants were showing symptoms of stunting, mosaic, necrosis and foliar distortion (Fig. 1). Spherical particles measuring 80-100 nm in diameter were observed by electron microscopy, giving the initial evidence that a tospovirus might be involved in the disease. Sap from the infected leaves of five different Cape gooseberry plants were inoculated on healthy indicator plants: Petunia hybrida and Chenopodium amaranticolor reacted with local lesions; Datura stramonium, Solanum gilo, S. lycopersicum, S. nigrum, Physalis angulata, P. floridana and P. peruviana (Fig. 1) displayed systemic symptoms. Host reactions were typical for those caused by tospoviruses and symptoms on Physalis species reproduced those observed in the original samples. Testing by plate trapped-ELISA, a positive reaction was only obtained from all five samples using anti-TCSV antiserum (Embrapa, CNPH, Brazil). Negative ELISA results were obtained using antiserum against four other tospoviruses: Tomato spotted wilt virus, Groundnut ringspot virus, Impatiens necrotic spot virus and Chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus. RT-PCR was performed using primers designed to conserved regions of the tospoviral S RNA (Eiras et al., 2001). This generated 440 bp DNA fragments, whose sequence revealed a high degree of nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Argentina (98-99%) and Brazil (93-95%). Alignment of the partial coat protein nucleotide sequences showed that the Physalis TCSV isolate (GenBank Accession No. JQ034525) clustered with other TCSV isolates, sharing a clade with Argentinean isolates (Fig. 2). Cape gooseberry is a fruit crop of great nutritional and economic value, which has gradually gained acceptance in international markets, due to its flavour and medicinal properties. In Brazil, it was introduced as a commercial crop into small farms in southern Brazil (Rufato et al., 2008). To our knowledge, this is the first report of natural occurrence of TCSV in commercial crops of Cape gooseberry. To date the disease is restricted to Rio Grande do Sul State. Further epidemiological studies are necessary for understanding the spread of TCSV into this relatively new introduced crop in Brazil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All plants in the affected Cape gooseberry area showed disease symptoms.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Outcome
symptoms of stunting, mosaic, necrosis and foliar distortione0
Value
100%e0
Setting
cultivated areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease was identified in a 5 ha cultivated area, where 100% of the plants were showing symptoms of stunting, mosaic, necrosis and foliar distortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spherical particles 80-100 nm in diameter were observed in infected Cape gooseberry.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Outcome
Spherical particlese0
Value
80-100 nme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spherical particles measuring 80-100 nm in diameter were observed by electron microscopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Petunia hybrida and Chenopodium amaranticolor developed local lesions.

Taxon
Petunia hybrida and Chenopodium amaranticolorPetunia ×hybridaChenopodium amaranticolore0
Treatment
Sap from the infected leaves of five different Cape gooseberry plantse1
Interactor
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianae1other
Outcome
local lesionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia x hybrida
Petunia ×hybrida · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium amaranticolor
Chenopodium amaranticolor · TaxonZoey Kroll / edibleoffice · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · InteractorIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petunia hybrida and Chenopodium amaranticolor reacted with local lesions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1307 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sap from the infected leaves of five different Cape gooseberry plants were inoculated on healthy indicator plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Datura stramonium, Solanum gilo, S. lycopersicum, S. nigrum, Physalis angulata, P. floridana and P. peruviana displayed systemic symptoms.

Taxon
Datura stramoniumDatura stramoniume0
Treatment
Sap from the infected leaves of five different Cape gooseberry plantse1
Outcome
systemic symptomse0
Qualifier
Solanum gilo, S. lycopersicum, S. nigrum, Physalis angulata, P. floridana and P. peruvianae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Datura stramonium, Solanum gilo, S. lycopersicum, S. nigrum, Physalis angulata, P. floridana and P. peruviana (Fig. 1) displayed systemic symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1455 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sap from the infected leaves of five different Cape gooseberry plants were inoculated on healthy indicator plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five Cape gooseberry samples reacted positively only with anti-TCSV antiserum.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Interactor
TCSVe0pathogen
Outcome
positive reactione0
Value
all five samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive reaction was only obtained from all five samples using anti-TCSV antiserum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ELISA tests were negative against four other tospoviruses.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Outcome
Negative ELISA resultse0
Qualifier
four other tospovirusese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Negative ELISA results were obtained using antiserum against four other tospoviruses: Tomato spotted wilt virus, Groundnut ringspot virus, Impatiens necrotic spot virus and Chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tospovirus RT-PCR generated 440 bp fragments from Cape gooseberry samples.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Outcome
DNA fragmentse0
Value
440 bpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This generated 440 bp DNA fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2099 · show in text ↑
e1

“RT-PCR was performed using primers designed to conserved regions of the tospoviral S RNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fragments had 98-99% nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Argentina.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Interactor
TCSVe0pathogen
Outcome
nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Argentinae0
Value
98-99%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high degree of nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Argentina (98-99%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fragments had 93-95% nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Brazil.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Interactor
TCSVe1pathogen
Outcome
nucleotide identitye1
Value
93-95%e0
Setting
Brazile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil (93-95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2209–2224 · show in text ↑
e1

“high degree of nucleotide identity with TCSV isolates from Argentina (98-99%) and Brazil (93-95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Physalis TCSV isolate clustered with other TCSV isolates in a clade with Argentinean isolates.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Interactor
TCSVe0pathogen
Outcome
clustered with other TCSV isolates, sharing a clade with Argentinean isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Physalis TCSV isolate (GenBank Accession No. JQ034525) clustered with other TCSV isolates, sharing a clade with Argentinean isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report the first natural occurrence of TCSV in commercial Cape gooseberry crops.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianae0
Interactor
TCSVe0pathogen
Outcome
natural occurrence of TCSVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is the first report of natural occurrence of TCSV in commercial crops of Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2753–2846 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disease was restricted to Rio Grande do Sul State at the time of the report.

Taxon
Cape gooseberryPhysalis peruvianat0
Outcome
disease is restricted to Rio Grande do Sul Statee0
Setting
Rio Grande do Sul Statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To date the disease is restricted to Rio Grande do Sul State”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–2908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cape gooseberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Chenopodium amaranticolorResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.