Paper · 1988 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effects of Ethephon on Boll Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Population Development, Cotton Fruiting, and Boll Opening1

T. J. Henneberry; T. Meng; W. D. Hutchison; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ethephon (2-chloroethyl) phosphonic acid) (“Prep”) was applied in 1985 and 1986 to cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L.), during early to late September to remove late season fruiting forms and to determine the effects on boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, population development, cotton quality, lint yield, fiber quality, and boll opening. In 1985, boll weevils ranged from approximately one to five per 4 m of cotton row at the time of application on 6 and 13 September. Populations decreased in ethephon-treated plots thereafter, and average numbers found in infested bolls and squares were reduced >95% as compared with infestations in untreated check plots. In 1986, boll weevils ranged from zero to less than one per 4 m of row at the time of treatments on 15, 23, and 29 September. Populations increased in all plots thereafter, but were on average 9.5 times greater in check plots than in ethephon-treated plots 30 to 44 d following treatment. In 1985, ethephon at rates of 1.12 kg (AI)/ha applied 6 or 13 September did not affect cotton lint yield, but 2.24 kg (AI)/ha applied 6 September reduced yield significantly, possibly because of delayed cotton harvest. In 1986, ethephon at 1.68 kg (AI)/ha had no effect on cotton yields or cotton fiber quality characteristics, but the fiber-length uniformity ratio was significantly higher in the ethephon-treated plots. Ethephon accelerated mature boll opening in the experimental plots in both years, demonstrating the potential for earlier harvest, stalk destruction, and cotton plow down, which are desirable cultural practices that help reduce overwintering boll weevil populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1985, ethephon reduced boll weevils in infested bolls and squares by more than 95% versus untreated checks.

Treatment
ethephon-treated plotse0
Interactor
boll weevilsAnthonomus grandise1pest
Outcome
average numbers found in infested bolls and squarese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>95%e0
Comparator
untreated check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandis · InteractorAgricultural Research Service , United States Department of Agriculture . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations decreased in ethephon-treated plots thereafter, and average numbers found in infested bolls and squares were reduced >95% as compared with infestations in untreated check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“boll weevils ranged from approximately one to five per 4 m of cotton row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, weevil populations rose in all plots, but untreated checks had 9.5 times more weevils than ethephon plots after 30 to 44 days.

Treatment
ethephon-treated plotse0
Interactor
boll weevilsAnthonomus grandise1pest
Outcome
Populationse0
Direction
9.5 times greater in check plotse0
Value
9.5 timese0
Comparator
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandis · InteractorAgricultural Research Service , United States Department of Agriculture . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations increased in all plots thereafter, but were on average 9.5 times greater in check plots than in ethephon-treated plots 30 to 44 d following treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1986, boll weevils ranged from zero to less than one per 4 m of row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1985, 1.12 kg (AI)/ha ethephon on either September date did not affect lint yield.

Treatment
ethephon at rates of 1.12 kg (AI)/hae0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
6 or 13 Septembere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1985, ethephon at rates of 1.12 kg (AI)/ha applied 6 or 13 September did not affect cotton lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1985, 2.24 kg (AI)/ha ethephon on 6 September significantly reduced yield.

Treatment
2.24 kg (AI)/ha applied 6 Septembere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.24 kg (AI)/ha applied 6 September reduced yield significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 1985, ethephon at rates of 1.12 kg (AI)/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, 1.68 kg (AI)/ha ethephon had no effect on cotton yield or fiber quality.

Treatment
ethephon at 1.68 kg (AI)/hae0
Outcome
cotton yields or cotton fiber quality characteristicse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1986, ethephon at 1.68 kg (AI)/ha had no effect on cotton yields or cotton fiber quality characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber-length uniformity ratio was significantly higher in ethephon-treated plots in 1986.

Treatment
ethephon-treated plotse0
Outcome
fiber-length uniformity ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fiber-length uniformity ratio was significantly higher in the ethephon-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon accelerated mature boll opening in both years.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
mature boll openinge0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon accelerated mature boll opening in the experimental plots in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors present earlier harvest and stalk destruction after ethephon as practices that may reduce overwintering boll weevils.

Interactor
boll weevilAnthonomus grandise0pest
Outcome
earlier harvest, stalk destruction, and cotton plow downe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandis · InteractorAgricultural Research Service , United States Department of Agriculture . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“demonstrating the potential for earlier harvest, stalk destruction, and cotton plow down, which are desirable cultural practices that help reduce overwintering boll weevil populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.