Paper · 1973 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Termination of Late Season Cotton Fruiting with Growth Regulators as an Insect‐Control Technique

D. L. Kittock; Jack R. Mauney; H. Fred Arle; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
29
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A technique is proposed for reducing the number of overwintering pink bollworms [ Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders)] by reducing their food supply late in the year. This is done by using growth regulators that prevent formation of new cotton ( Gossypium sp.) bolls late in the season, but do not affect development of existing bolls or vegetation. Since most of the late‐season bolls do not mature, the effect on lint yield would be minimal. Three chemicals, (2‐chloroethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride, (CCC); dimethylamine salt of (2,4‐dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid, (2,4‐D); and 2‐chloroethylphosphonic acid (Ethephon) were used. They were sprayed on cotton late in August and early in September. Each of the chemicals reduced the number of green bolls remaining after harvest by more than 90% at one or more dates in one or more tests. In most cases, lint yields were also reduced. In limited observations, we obtained 87 to 96% reduction in diapausing pink bollworm larvae from these treatments. The effects of Ethephon on seed and fiber quality were too severe to warrant its further use. Residue of 2,4‐D in seeds reduced germination. CCC reduced fiber strength in two of four tests. Further testing of the last two chemicals and evaluation of other chemicals are warranted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each of three chemicals reduced green bolls after harvest by more than 90% in at least one test.

Treatment
Each of the chemicalse0
Outcome
number of green bolls remaining after harveste0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 90%e0
Qualifier
at one or more dates in one or more testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of the chemicals reduced the number of green bolls remaining after harvest by more than 90% at one or more dates in one or more tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint yields were reduced in most cases.

Treatment
Growth Regulatorst0
Outcome
lint yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
In most casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, lint yields were also reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Fruiting with Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–65 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton Fruiting with Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments reduced diapausing pink bollworm larvae by 87 to 96% in limited observations.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
diapausing pink bollworm larvaee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
87 to 96%e0
Qualifier
In limited observationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In limited observations, we obtained 87 to 96% reduction in diapausing pink bollworm larvae from these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon had severe adverse effects on seed and fiber quality.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
seed and fiber qualitye0
Qualifier
too severe to warrant its further usee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Ethephon on seed and fiber quality were too severe to warrant its further use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D residue in seeds reduced germination.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
Residue of 2,4‐De0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue of 2,4‐D in seeds reduced germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC reduced fiber strength in two of four tests.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
fiber strengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in two of four testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC reduced fiber strength in two of four tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

chlormequat chloride · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

class · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.