Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Cotton Plants to Low Concentrations of Ethrel and Their Effect on The Development Opening Percentage Of Bolls

Amany El-Ashmouny; E. A. EL- Waraky

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Afield trail was conducted at Sakha Agricultural research station farm, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate to study the effect of Ethrel at low concentration ( 5 cm / litre) as foliar application at different stages of bolls maturity (35, 50, 65 and 80 % ) after 120 days after sowing in addition of control ( untreated plants) on yield and its parmuters of cotton Giza 97 cultivar during 2019 and 2020 seasons.Complete randomized block design was applied with three replicates were used with five treatments. There are significant differences between all treatments by using Ethrel at the most of studie d charecters. Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity significantly increased number of fruiting branches, total chlorophyll, number of open bolls, earliness percentage, lint percentage, boll weight and seed cotton yield / fed. On the other hand, spraying cotton plants with Ethrel in this stage optained the lowest values of boll retention %, boll shedding in opposite of untreated plants which obtained the highest values. There are not any significant differences between all treatment in some characters as plant height and seed index which not affected by the application of Ethrel. To further improve the boll opening percentage for better yield performance same experiment was conducted using 5 cm / litre of ethrel at 50 % maturity at four times, 10 days between them ( beginning with120,130,140 and 150 DAS) .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel treatments significantly differed for most studied cotton characters.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
Ethrele0
Outcome
most of studie d charecterse0
Setting
Sakha Agricultural research station farm, Kafr El-Sheikh governoratee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There are significant differences between all treatments by using Ethrel at the most of studie d charecters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–610 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sakha Agricultural research station farm, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 5cm/litre and 50% boll maturity significantly increased cotton fruiting branches and open bolls.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturitye0
Outcome
number of fruiting branchese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
number of open bollse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity significantly increased number of fruiting branches, total chlorophyll, number of open bolls, earliness percentage, lint percentage, boll weight and seed cotton yield / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 5cm/litre and 50% boll maturity significantly increased total chlorophyll.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturitye0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity significantly increased number of fruiting branches, total chlorophyll, number of open bolls, earliness percentage, lint percentage, boll weight and seed cotton yield / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 5cm/litre and 50% boll maturity significantly increased earliness and lint percentages.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturitye0
Outcome
earliness percentage, lint percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity significantly increased number of fruiting branches, total chlorophyll, number of open bolls, earliness percentage, lint percentage, boll weight and seed cotton yield / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 5cm/litre and 50% boll maturity significantly increased boll weight and seed cotton yield per feddan.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturitye0
Outcome
boll weight and seed cotton yield / fede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity significantly increased number of fruiting branches, total chlorophyll, number of open bolls, earliness percentage, lint percentage, boll weight and seed cotton yield / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton sprayed with Ethrel at that stage had the lowest boll retention and shedding compared with the highest values in untreated plants.

Treatment
Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturitye1
Outcome
boll retention %, boll sheddinge0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, spraying cotton plants with Ethrel in this stage optained the lowest values of boll retention %, boll shedding in opposite of untreated plants which obtained the highest values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of Ethrel with 5cm/litre at 50% bolls maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and seed index did not differ significantly among Ethrel treatments.

Material
Giza 97e1
Treatment
application of Ethrele0
Outcome
plant height and seed indexe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There are not any significant differences between all treatment in some characters as plant height and seed index which not affected by the application of Ethrel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton Giza 97 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–373 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

stage · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.