Paper · 1971 · Experimental Agriculture

Effects of Soil Moisture Stress on Two Varieties of Upland Cotton in Israel I. The Coastal Plain Region

A. Marani; A. Amirav

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Effects of moisture stress during different stages of cotton development were examined in two experiments when temperatures were mild and evapotranspiration less than 6 mm./day. Two varieties of upland cotton, Acala 4–42 and Deltapine Smoothleaf, were affected similarly. Moisture stress at the beginning of flowering reduced growth rate and the numbers of flowers and bolls. During the second half of the flowering period it reduced the percentage of boll retention, boll number, boll weight, seed index, lint index and lint length. Stress during boll development had similar effects and caused earlier maturity. Lint yield was reduced significantly by moisture stress during each of the periods but tensile strength of lint was not affected. Three irrigations, if properly timed so that no appreciable moisture stress occurred, were sufficient for high yields and good quality of lint, and the first could be postponed until after flowering began without any loss in yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cotton varieties responded similarly.

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
Acala 4–42 and Deltapine Smoothleafe0
Outcome
affected similarlye0

Verbatim

e0

“Two varieties of upland cotton, Acala 4–42 and Deltapine Smoothleaf, were affected similarly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress at flowering onset reduced growth rate and flower and boll numbers.

Treatment
Moisture stress at the beginning of floweringe0
Outcome
growth rate and the numbers of flowers and bollse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture stress at the beginning of flowering reduced growth rate and the numbers of flowers and bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress in the latter half of flowering reduced boll retention, number and weight.

Treatment
second half of the flowering periode0
Outcome
percentage of boll retention, boll number, boll weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second half of the flowering period it reduced the percentage of boll retention, boll number, boll weight, seed index, lint index and lint length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress in the latter half of flowering reduced seed index, lint index and lint length.

Treatment
second half of the flowering periode0
Outcome
seed index, lint index and lint lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second half of the flowering period it reduced the percentage of boll retention, boll number, boll weight, seed index, lint index and lint length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress during boll development had similar adverse effects.

Treatment
Stress during boll developmente0
Outcome
similar effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stress during boll development had similar effects and caused earlier maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress during boll development caused earlier maturity.

Treatment
Stress during boll developmente0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stress during boll development had similar effects and caused earlier maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress in each period significantly reduced lint yield.

Treatment
moisture stress during each of the periodse0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was reduced significantly by moisture stress during each of the periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress did not affect lint tensile strength.

Treatment
moisture stresse1
Outcome
tensile strength of linte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tensile strength of lint was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“by moisture stress during each of the periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three well-timed irrigations sufficed for high lint yield and good quality.

Outcome
Three irrigations, if properly timed so that no appreciable moisture stress occurrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three irrigations, if properly timed so that no appreciable moisture stress occurred, were sufficient for high yields and good quality of lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The first irrigation could be postponed until after flowering began without yield loss.

Outcome
postponed until after flowering begane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first could be postponed until after flowering began without any loss in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–65 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 10 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

stage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.