Paper · 2015 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Effect of Super Absorbent Polymer and Irrigation Deficit on Water Use Efficiency, Growth and Yield of Cotton

Hamid-Reza FALLAHI; Reza TAHERPOUR KALANTARI; Mahsa AGHHAVANI-SHAJARI; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable use of water resources in agriculture is a necessity for many arid countries. In order to investigate the effect of water deficit, irrigation after 120 (control), 155 (moderate water stress) and 190 mm (sever water stress) pan evaporation and super absorbent polymer rates (SAP) (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1) on growth, yield and water use efficiency of cotton, an experiment was conducted as split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Moreover, the effect of water quality (distilled water and solutions of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 1.25% NaCl) was investigated on water holding capacity by SAP. Results revealed that moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton. The results for plant height, plant dry weight, boll number per plant and fiber yield in this treatment were 16, 28, 42 and 10% higher than control treatment, respectively. Water deficit and SAP application improved the water use efficiency (WUE) of cotton. The amount of WUE in moderate water stress treatment along with consumption of 60 or 90 kg ha-1 SAP was 26% higher than for control treatment. In addition, water holding capacity by SAP in distilled water treatment was 7 times higher than in the case of 1.25% NaCl solution. The overall results showed that irrigation deficit and SAP application are two appropriate strategies for crop production in areas affected by drought stress, especially if low saline water sources are used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress with 60 kg/ha SAP was the best treatment for growth and yield indices of cotton.

Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
growth and yield indicese0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
60 kg ha-1 SAP applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress combined with 60 kg/ha SAP gave higher plant height in cotton compared with the control treatment.

Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
16e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results for plant height, plant dry weight, boll number per plant and fiber yield in this treatment were 16, 28, 42 and 10% higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress combined with 60 kg/ha SAP gave higher plant dry weight in cotton compared with the control treatment.

Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
plant dry weighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
28e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results for plant height, plant dry weight, boll number per plant and fiber yield in this treatment were 16, 28, 42 and 10% higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress combined with 60 kg/ha SAP gave higher boll number per plant in cotton compared with the control treatment.

Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
boll number per plante1
Direction
highere1
Value
42e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results for plant height, plant dry weight, boll number per plant and fiber yield in this treatment were 16, 28, 42 and 10% higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress combined with 60 kg/ha SAP gave higher fiber yield in cotton compared with the control treatment.

Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
fiber yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
10%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results for plant height, plant dry weight, boll number per plant and fiber yield in this treatment were 16, 28, 42 and 10% higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress with 60 or 90 kg/ha SAP raised water use efficiency of cotton by 26% over the control treatment.

Treatment
moderate water stresse2
Outcome
WUEe2
Direction
highere2
Value
26%e2
Qualifier
60 or 90 kg ha-1 SAPe2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e2

“The amount of WUE in moderate water stress treatment along with consumption of 60 or 90 kg ha-1 SAP was 26% higher than for control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and SAP application improved water use efficiency of cotton.

Treatment
Water deficit and SAP applicatione3
Outcome
water use efficiencye3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Water deficit and SAP application improved the water use efficiency (WUE) of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water holding capacity of SAP in distilled water was 7 times higher than in 1.25% NaCl solution.

Treatment
distilled watere4
Outcome
water holding capacity by SAPe4
Direction
highere4
Value
7 timese4
Comparator
1.25% NaCl solutione4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e4

“water holding capacity by SAP in distilled water treatment was 7 times higher than in the case of 1.25% NaCl solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1365 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation deficit and SAP application are appropriate strategies for cotton crop production in areas affected by drought stress.

Outcome
crop productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water stress (irrigation intervals of aprox. 15 days) along with 60 kg ha-1 SAP application was the best treatment in terms of growth and yield indices of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
e5

“irrigation deficit and SAP application are two appropriate strategies for crop production in areas affected by drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1524 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 10 positive, 21 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

36 papers: 14 positive, 22 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.