Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Field water deficits reduced leaf area index, plant height and dry matter accumulation of cotton by 80 to 85% compared with irrigated controls.

A claim from Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins in Field-Grown Cotton · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field water deficits reduced leaf area index, plant height and dry matter accumulation of cotton by 80 to 85% compared with irrigated controls.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
field water deficitse1
Outcome
leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80 to 85%e1
Comparator
irrigated controlse1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198

Title

Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins in Field-Grown Cotton

John J. Burke; Jerry L. Hatfield; Robert R. Klein; et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1985. doi:10.1104/pp.78.2.394

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9eda2f1da00219f71379e3ca4088412d2bcd6ef714323a6169642d6bff2c48b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.