Paper · 2002 · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Water demand and irrigation scheduling of drip irrigation for cotton under plastic mulch

Cai Huan

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted at the Experimental Station of Soil Amelioration, Shehezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in 2000 from May to August.It is found that the excessive irrigation is not benefit to the increase of contton yield.In order to attain high yield and high efficiency of water use, the total water amount must be controlled in the range of 345mm to 380mm.The moderate water deficit in seedling stage, full water supply in bud and flower stages and properly controlling of water supply in the later stage of flower are in favor of the increase of cotton yield. The moderate water deficit can elevate the quality of cotton. It is concluded that the best irrigation pattern is 12 to 14 times of irrigation with water amount of 25mm to 30mm for each time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive irrigation did not increase cotton yield.

Treatment
excessive irrigatione0
Outcome
contton yielde0
Direction
not benefit to the increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive irrigation is not benefit to the increase of contton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–245 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water deficit at seedling stage and full supply at bud and flower stages favored cotton yield.

Treatment
moderate water deficit in seedling stagee0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water deficit in seedling stage, full water supply in bud and flower stages and properly controlling of water supply in the later stage of flower are in favor of the increase of cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water deficit elevated cotton quality.

Treatment
moderate water deficite0
Outcome
quality of cottone0
Direction
elevatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate water deficit can elevate the quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–648 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Total water amount should be 345mm to 380mm for high yield and water use efficiency.

Outcome
total water amount must be controlled in the range of 345mm to 380mme0
Value
345mm to 380mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to attain high yield and high efficiency of water use, the total water amount must be controlled in the range of 345mm to 380mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended irrigation pattern is 12 to 14 irrigations of 25mm to 30mm each.

Outcome
best irrigation patterne0
Value
12 to 14 times of irrigatione0
Qualifier
25mm to 30mm for each timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“best irrigation pattern is 12 to 14 times of irrigation with water amount of 25mm to 30mm for each time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 304 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.