Paper · 1982 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The effects of duration, timing and chemical amelioration of short-term waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay

AS Hodgson

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of the duration, timing and chemical amelioration of short-term waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay soil were investigated at Narrabri, N.S.W. Water was run in furrows for 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 h at each of the three crop irrigations. In other treatments, watering was extended from 4 to 16 h either at the first, second or third irrigation, to establish at which irrigation waterlogging had the most effect. Soil applications of hydrogen peroxide and foliar sprays of urea were evaluated as chemical ameliorants of short-term waterlogging. Increasing the period of inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced green bolls m-2 by 17.5 %, open bolls m-2 by 20.6 % and final lint yield by 300 kg ha-1 or 18.3 %. No further decreases were observed by increasing the period of inundation to 64 h. Extended waterlogging was equally damaging at each of the three irrigations. The rate of recovery from waterlogging to an air-filled porosity of 0.10 cm3 cm-3 in the top 20 cm of soil was highly correlated with lint yield, and was consistent with results from a previous season. Soil applications of hydrogen peroxide did not ameliorate waterlogging damage, whereas significantly higher lint yields were obtained from foliar sprays of urea applied prior to each irrigation. The results confirmed that cotton should be irrigated and thereafter drained rapidly in this soil to minimize loss of yield. This could be achieved by increasing the rate of application of irrigation water and by using shorter fields and steeper slopes. The use of chemical ameliorants requires further investigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced green bolls by 17.5%.

Treatment
32 he0
Outcome
green bolls m-2e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.5 %e0
Comparator
4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the period of inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced green bolls m-2 by 17.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced open bolls by 20.6%.

Treatment
32 he0
Outcome
open bolls m-2e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.6 %e0
Comparator
4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the period of inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced green bolls m-2 by 17.5 %, open bolls m-2 by 20.6 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced lint yield by 300 kg ha-1 or 18.3%.

Treatment
32 he0
Outcome
final lint yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
300 kg ha-1 or 18.3 %e0
Comparator
4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the period of inundation from 4 to 32 h reduced green bolls m-2 by 17.5 %, open bolls m-2 by 20.6 % and final lint yield by 300 kg ha-1 or 18.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inundation extended to 64 h caused no further decreases.

Treatment
increasing the period of inundation to 64 he0
Outcome
further decreasese0
Direction
No further decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No further decreases were observed by increasing the period of inundation to 64 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended waterlogging damaged cotton equally at all three irrigations.

Treatment
Extended waterlogginge0
Outcome
equally damaginge0
Qualifier
each of the three irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extended waterlogging was equally damaging at each of the three irrigations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of soil air-filled porosity was highly correlated with lint yield.

Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
highly correlatede0
Qualifier
air-filled porosity of 0.10 cm3 cm-3 in the top 20 cm of soile0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of recovery from waterlogging to an air-filled porosity of 0.10 cm3 cm-3 in the top 20 cm of soil was highly correlated with lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil hydrogen peroxide did not ameliorate waterlogging damage.

Treatment
Soil applications of hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
waterlogging damagee0
Direction
did not amelioratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil applications of hydrogen peroxide did not ameliorate waterlogging damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea before each irrigation significantly raised lint yields.

Treatment
foliar sprays of urea applied prior to each irrigatione0
Outcome
lint yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher lint yields were obtained from foliar sprays of urea applied prior to each irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton should be irrigated and drained rapidly in this soil to minimize yield loss.

Treatment
irrigated and thereafter drained rapidlye0
Outcome
minimize loss of yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton should be irrigated and thereafter drained rapidly in this soil to minimize loss of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1425 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.