Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing N rate did not affect yield or yield components of irrigated or rain-fed cotton.

A claim from Cotton in Ultra‐Narrow Row Spacing: Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rate did not affect yield or yield components of irrigated or rain-fed cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Increasing N ratee4
Outcome
yield or yield componentse4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the Mid‐South USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–152
e4

“Increasing N rate did not affect yield or yield components of irrigated or rain‐fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1104

Title

Cotton in Ultra‐Narrow Row Spacing: Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates

Donald J. Boquet Agronomy Journal 2005. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0279

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ebdfd1e68b17ab366824bf0d5ffab344894a591f3db6ca97a838ad5accdf706e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.