Paper · 2025 · Plants

Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation Under Once-Only Irrigation Throughout the Growing Season: Investigating the Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application

Zhangshu Xie; Yeling Qin; Xuefang Xie; et al.

17
claims
38
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To identify optimal strategies for high-yield and high-efficiency cultivation under a “short-season direct-seeded cotton with once-only irrigation” regime, we conducted two-year field experiments (2022 and 2023) using a split-plot factorial design with three planting densities (30,000 (D1), 45,000 (D2), and 60,000 (D3) plants·ha−1) and three nitrogen application rates (150 (N1), 180 (N2), and 210 (N3) kg·ha−1). Our study systematically examined how these treatment combinations influenced canopy architecture, physiological traits, yield components, and fiber quality. The results showed that increased planting density significantly enhanced plant height, the leaf area index (LAI), and the number of fruiting branches, with the highest density (D3) contributing to a more compact and efficient canopy. Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity, reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation, delayed functional leaf senescence, and prolonged the canopy’s photosynthetic performance. A significant interaction between planting density and nitrogen application was observed. The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen) consistently achieved the highest fruiting branch count, boll number per plant, and yields of both seed cotton and lint in both years, while maintaining stable fiber quality. This indicates its strong capacity to balance high yield with quality and maintain physiological resilience. By contrast, the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen) exhibited a loose canopy, premature photosynthetic decline, and the lowest yield. The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen) promoted vigorous early growth but reduced stress tolerance during later growth stages, leading to yield instability. These findings demonstrate that moderately increasing planting density while maintaining appropriate nitrogen levels can effectively optimize canopy structure, improve stress resilience, and enhance yield under short-season direct-seeded cotton systems with once-only irrigation. This provides both theoretical underpinning and practical guidance for achieving stable and efficient cotton production under such systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting density significantly enhanced plant height, leaf area index and the number of fruiting branches in cotton.

Treatment
increased planting densitye1
Outcome
plant height, the leaf area index (LAI), and the number of fruiting branchese1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that increased planting density significantly enhanced plant height, the leaf area index (LAI), and the number of fruiting branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest density (D3) contributed to a more compact and efficient cotton canopy.

Treatment
highest density (D3)e2
Outcome
canopye2
Direction
more compact and efficiente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the highest density (D3) contributing to a more compact and efficient canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton.

Treatment
Moderate nitrogen input (N2)e3
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) activitye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate nitrogen input (N2) reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation in cotton.

Treatment
Moderate nitrogen input (N2)e3
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulatione4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–886 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate nitrogen input (N2) delayed functional leaf senescence in cotton.

Treatment
Moderate nitrogen input (N2)e3
Outcome
functional leaf senescencee5
Direction
delayede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–886 · show in text ↑
e5

“delayed functional leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate nitrogen input (N2) prolonged the photosynthetic performance of the cotton canopy.

Treatment
Moderate nitrogen input (N2)e3
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee6
Direction
prolongede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moderate nitrogen input (N2) significantly increased peroxidase (POD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–886 · show in text ↑
e6

“prolonged the canopy’s photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1021 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant interaction between planting density and nitrogen application was observed in cotton.

Treatment
planting density and nitrogen applicatione7
Outcome
interactione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e7

“A significant interaction between planting density and nitrogen application was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen) achieved the highest fruiting branch count and boll number per plant in both years.

Treatment
The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen)e1
Outcome
fruiting branch count, boll number per plante1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen) consistently achieved the highest fruiting branch count, boll number per plant, and yields of both seed cotton and lint in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N2 treatment achieved the highest seed cotton and lint yields in both years.

Treatment
The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen)e1
Outcome
yields of both seed cotton and linte1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in both yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen) consistently achieved the highest fruiting branch count, boll number per plant, and yields of both seed cotton and lint in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N2 treatment maintained stable cotton fiber quality.

Treatment
D3N2 treatmente1
Outcome
fiber qualitye2
Direction
maintaining stablee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N2 treatment (high density with moderate nitrogen) consistently achieved the highest fruiting branch count, boll number per plant, and yields of both seed cotton and lint in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1303 · show in text ↑
e2

“while maintaining stable fiber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen) gave a loose cotton canopy.

Treatment
the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen)e1
Outcome
canopye1
Direction
loosee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen) exhibited a loose canopy, premature photosynthetic decline, and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D1N1 treatment caused premature photosynthetic decline in cotton.

Treatment
the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen)e1
Outcome
photosynthetic declinee1
Direction
prematuree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen) exhibited a loose canopy, premature photosynthetic decline, and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D1N1 treatment gave the lowest cotton yield.

Treatment
the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“the D1N1 treatment (low density and low nitrogen) exhibited a loose canopy, premature photosynthetic decline, and the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen) promoted vigorous early growth of cotton.

Treatment
The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen)e1
Outcome
early growthe1
Direction
promoted vigorouse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen) promoted vigorous early growth but reduced stress tolerance during later growth stages, leading to yield instability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N3 treatment reduced stress tolerance of cotton in later growth stages.

Treatment
The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen)e1
Outcome
stress tolerancee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen) promoted vigorous early growth but reduced stress tolerance during later growth stages, leading to yield instability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1767 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D3N3 treatment led to cotton yield instability.

Outcome
yield instabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The D3N3 treatment (high density and high nitrogen) promoted vigorous early growth but reduced stress tolerance during later growth stages, leading to yield instability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately increasing planting density while keeping appropriate nitrogen levels can optimize canopy structure, improve stress resilience and enhance cotton yield.

Treatment
moderately increasing planting density while maintaining appropriate nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
optimize canopy structure, improve stress resilience, and enhance yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-Season Direct-Seeded Cotton Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“moderately increasing planting density while maintaining appropriate nitrogen levels can effectively optimize canopy structure, improve stress resilience, and enhance yield under short-season direct-seeded cotton systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–2021 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

nitrogen · tolerance: abiotic · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.