Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotton yield did not respond to nitrogen in the Missouri experiments under adverse weather.

A claim from Determination of cotton nitrogen status with a handheld chlorophyll meter · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield did not respond to nitrogen in the Missouri experiments under adverse weather.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
did not responde0
Qualifier
adverse weather conditionse0
Setting
Missourie0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because of adverse weather conditions, cotton yield in Missouri experiments did not respond to N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–787

Title

Determination of cotton nitrogen status with a handheld chlorophyll meter

C.W. Wood; P.W. Tracy; D.W. Reeves; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 1992. doi:10.1080/01904169209364409

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-db8b659a7481cd6b2b481459d2a93f504517c0fbecc74c879517f12cbad59fd4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.