Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar-applied N significantly increased late square and green boll numbers after the third irrigation

A claim from Effects of foliar applied nitrogen fertilizer on cotton waterlogged in a cracking grey clay · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied N significantly increased late square and green boll numbers after the third irrigation

Treatment
foliar-applied Ne1
Outcome
late square and green boll numberse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
after the third irrigatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar-applied N significantly increased late square and green boll numbers after the third irrigation, and produced more open bolls and heavier lint yields than the control treatment at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–699
t0

“on cotton waterlogged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–67

Title

Effects of foliar applied nitrogen fertilizer on cotton waterlogged in a cracking grey clay

AS Hodgson; DA MacLeod Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1987. doi:10.1071/ar9870681

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e16d85ce21f5b3f06b876e85bb42f06f7a24213d171cde45c007c18141ae2012 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Foliar urea before each irrigation significantly raised lint yields.

    The effects of duration, timing and chemical amelioration of short-term waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay · 1982

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Foliar methanol did not increase cotton yield at any location.

    Foliar Methanol Applications to Cotton in the Southeastern United States: Leaf Physiology, Growth, and Yield Components · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Fluazifop at four weeks gave cotton 93% of weed-free yield.

    Growth and Interaction of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) by Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 1991 · compared with weed-free cotton

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Peak flowering spraying somewhat reduced weight of late opening bolls.

    Cotton Flowering and Fruiting Responses to Application Timing of Chemical Growth Retardants1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers produced no significant yield response.

    Effects of foliar fertilization of texas southern high plains cotton: Leaf phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, boron, calcium, and yield distribution · 1999

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    First-harvest lint yield was generally unaffected by foliar treatments.

    Influence of surfactants on potassium uptake and yield response of cotton to foliar potassium nitrate · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers did not significantly affect lint or seed yield.

    Effects of Foliar Fertilization of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton: Leaf Nitrogen and Growth Parameters · 1998

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    A single 1 mL water spray reduced cotton seed set by 55%.

    Sprinkler‐Induced Flower Losses and Yield Reductions in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2003

    Opposite direction

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.