Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar fertilizers produced no significant yield response.

A claim from Effects of foliar fertilization of texas southern high plains cotton: Leaf phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, boron, calcium, and yield distribution · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers produced no significant yield response.

Treatment
foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield responsee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lack of a significant yield response from the foliar fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2146
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–76

Title

Effects of foliar fertilization of texas southern high plains cotton: Leaf phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, boron, calcium, and yield distribution

C. W. Bednarz; N. W. Hopper; M. G. Hickey Journal of Plant Nutrition 1999. doi:10.1080/01904169909365678

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-daebf29fd012fc798850d3837c67445ccedb94e7ab522e589eb3254e59a62bc5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Potassium treatments significantly favored plant height at harvest, no. of internodes and sympodial/plant with foliar potassium silicate.

    Influence of Potassium Fertilization and Spraying of Zinc and Manganese on Cotton Growth and Productivity · 2016

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    NP+FP yielded more lint.

    Evaluation of organophosphate insecticides on performance of transgenic and conventional cotton · 2005

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers did not significantly affect lint or seed yield.

    Effects of Foliar Fertilization of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton: Leaf Nitrogen and Growth Parameters · 1998

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Foliar urea before each irrigation significantly raised lint yields.

    The effects of duration, timing and chemical amelioration of short-term waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay · 1982

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Four foliar B applications increased yields 8% over untreated check.

    Foliar Feeding of Cotton: Evaluating Potassium Sources, Potassium Solution Buffering, and Boron · 1998

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Foliar ascorbic acid at 40–60 mg/L improved crop yield in heat stressed cotton.

    Ascorbic acid triggered physiochemical transformations at different phenological stages of heat‐stressed Bt cotton · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Foliar Zn, B, Mn, Cu and Fe spray improved seed-cotton yield over soil-applied NPK fertilization.

    Role of foliar feeding of micronutrients in yield maximization of cotton in Punjab · 2013 · compared with soil applied NPK fertilizers

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Combined silicon and salicylic acid foliar application increased cotton yield.

    Silicon and salicylic acid in the physiology and yield of cotton · 2019

    Opposite direction

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers did not significantly affect lint or seed yield.

    Effects of Foliar Fertilization of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton: Leaf Nitrogen and Growth Parameters · 1998

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    By the end of season K fertilization resulted in 19% more seed weight in cotton.

    Dry matter production, nutrient uptake, and growth of cotton as affected by potassium fertilization · 1997

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Following hairy vetch, no fertilizer nitrogen optimized no tillage lint yield at 1238 kg ha −1.

    Long‐Term Tillage, Cover Crop, and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Cotton: Yield and Fiber Properties · 2004

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Nitrogen fertilizer resulted in greater cotton lint yields in all three years.

    Site‐Specific Irrigation and Nitrogen Management for Cotton Production in the Southern High Plains · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    PCU with 80 kg ha −1 PCPC increased cotton yields and fertilizer use efficiency.

    Cumulative release characteristics of controlled-release nitrogen and potassium fertilizers and their effects on soil fertility, and cotton growth · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Growth retardation in 1979 and 1980 increased average seed cotton yield to 4.95 Mg ha −1 with effluent.

    Drip Irrigation of Cotton with Treated Municipal Effluents: I. Yield Response · 1984

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Treated fertilizer increased cotton growth and yield.

    Crop Experiments on the Effect of 2‐Chloro‐6‐(Trichloromethyl)Pyridine for the Control of Nitrification of Ammonium and Urea Fertilizers1 · 1962 · compared with equal rates of untreated fertilizers

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Recommended nitrogen increased cotton lint and seed yield in all three years.

    Nitrogen and Mepiquat Chloride Effects on the Production of Nonrank, Irrigated, Short‐Season Cotton · 1994

    Opposite direction

541 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.