Paper · 2005 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Evaluation of organophosphate insecticides on performance of transgenic and conventional cotton

Christopher Alan Hundley

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) acreage has increased dramatically over the last six years. Reports of variable results in fiber quality and yield have arisen in these cultivars. Some changes in production practices have occurred coincident with the introduction of transgenic technology, such as reduced use of broad-spectrum insecticides, including organophosphates (OP) that could potentially influence the growth and yield of cotton. One factor that might affect these parameters is the difference in the amount of foliarly-applied phosphorus (P) between an OP and non-phosphate (NP) insecticide regime. Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate selected growth characteristics, yield, and fiber quality of genetically modified and conventional cotton as influenced by OP and foliar phosphorus (FP) applications. A four replication strip-plot experimental design was utilized with cultivar serving as the whole plot and insecticide regime as the sub-plot. Three cultivars of the same recurrent parent (ST4892BR, ST4793R, and ST474) were planted in 2001 and 2002 under irrigated conditions in Burleson County, TX on a Weswood silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Fluventic Ustochrept). The insecticide regime consisted of NP, NP+FP, and OP treatments. The FP was applied at P2O5 weight equivalent to the P component in the concurrent OP application. ST4892BR had greater lint yield than ST4793R and ST474. The yield increase can be explained through plant mapping analysis which showed ST4892BR producing larger bolls and greater boll numbers. In addition, evaluation of fruiting distribution showed ST4892BR contained more lint on sympodial branches 6 through 10. The insecticide regime effect on lint yield resulted in higher yield (P=0.08) for the NP+FP regime. Examination of yield components revealed NP+FP increased second position bolls, predominantly at sympodial branches 6 through 10. Leaf tissue analysis revealed increased levels of P for the OP and NP+FP over that of the NP insecticide regime, which indicates a potential for plants to acquire P from OP insecticides. Furthermore, the considerable yield response to small amounts of FP is not clearly understood. While conclusive evidence exists regarding cultivar yield differences, this study does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that OP insecticides influence growth, yield, or fiber quality characteristics of these cotton cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST4892BR had greater lint yield than ST4793R and ST474.

Material
ST4892BRe0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ST4793R and ST474e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST4892BR had greater lint yield than ST4793R and ST474”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST4892BR produced larger bolls and more bolls.

Material
ST4892BRe0
Outcome
larger bolls and greater boll numberse0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST4892BR producing larger bolls and greater boll numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST4892BR had more lint on sympodial branches 6 through 10.

Material
ST4892BRe0
Outcome
lint on sympodial branches 6 through 10e0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST4892BR contained more lint on sympodial branches 6 through 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP+FP yielded more lint.

Treatment
NP+FPe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher yield (P=0.08) for the NP+FP regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP+FP increased second position bolls.

Treatment
NP+FPe0
Outcome
second position bollse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NP+FP increased second position bolls, predominantly at sympodial branches 6 through 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1929 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OP increased leaf phosphorus relative to NP.

Treatment
OPe0
Outcome
levels of Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NP insecticide regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased levels of P for the OP and NP+FP over that of the NP insecticide regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2042 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP+FP increased leaf phosphorus relative to NP.

Treatment
NP+FPe0
Outcome
levels of Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NP insecticide regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased levels of P for the OP and NP+FP over that of the NP insecticide regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2042 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.