Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Furrow Seeding with Plastic Mulching Increases Stand Establishment and Lint Yield of Cotton in a Saline Field

Hezhong Dong; Weijiang Li; Wei Tang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
104
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Uniform stand establishment is essential for profitable cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in saline fields. This study was conducted during 2003 and 2004 to determine if furrow‐bed seeding and plastic mulching improve stand establishment and cotton lint yield in a saline field. The experiment was arranged in a split‐plot design with seeding patterns (flat‐seeded and furrow‐seeded) as main plots and mulching (with or without plastic mulching) as subplots. The effects of seeding patterns, mulching, and their interactions on root‐zone salinity, soil temperature, stand establishment, and lint yield were monitored. Furrow seeding reduced the root‐zone salinity, while plastic mulching both reduced salinity and increased soil temperatures. As a result, furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively. Plastic mulching and furrow seeding also enhanced earliness as indicated by the percentage of the first two harvests. Physiological assay 30 d after seeding (DAS) showed that plastic mulching and furrow seeding substantially reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues, inhibited peroxidation of lipids, and improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn) and dry matter production. The overall results suggest that use of plastic mulching plus furrow‐bed seeding would be a suitable cultural practice for enhancing cotton production in saline soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding reduced root-zone salinity.

Treatment
Furrow seedinge0
Outcome
root‐zone salinitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow seeding reduced the root‐zone salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching reduced root-zone salinity.

Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
salinitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching both reduced salinity and increased soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching increased soil temperatures.

Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
soil temperaturese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching both reduced salinity and increased soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased stand establishment in 2003 versus flat seeding without mulch.

Treatment
furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
stand establishmente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103e0
Qualifier
2003e0
Comparator
flat‐seeded cotton without mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased lint yield in 2003 versus flat seeding without mulch.

Treatment
furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
2003e0
Comparator
flat‐seeded cotton without mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased stand establishment in 2004 versus flat seeding without mulch.

Treatment
furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
stand establishmente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
92e0
Qualifier
2004e0
Comparator
flat‐seeded cotton without mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased lint yield in 2004 versus flat seeding without mulch.

Treatment
furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
2004e0
Comparator
flat‐seeded cotton without mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and furrow seeding enhanced crop earliness.

Treatment
Plastic mulching and furrow seedinge0
Outcome
earlinesse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
percentage of the first two harvestse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic mulching and furrow seeding also enhanced earliness as indicated by the percentage of the first two harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and furrow seeding reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues.

Treatment
plastic mulching and furrow seedinge0
Outcome
Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and furrow seeding substantially reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues, inhibited peroxidation of lipids, and improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn) and dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and furrow seeding inhibited peroxidation of lipids.

Treatment
plastic mulching and furrow seedinge0
Outcome
peroxidation of lipidse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and furrow seeding substantially reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues, inhibited peroxidation of lipids, and improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn) and dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and furrow seeding improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn).

Treatment
plastic mulching and furrow seedinge0
Outcome
leaf photosynthesis (Pn)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and furrow seeding substantially reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues, inhibited peroxidation of lipids, and improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn) and dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulching and furrow seeding improved dry matter production.

Treatment
plastic mulching and furrow seedinge0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic mulching and furrow seeding substantially reduced Na + accumulation both in root and leaf tissues, inhibited peroxidation of lipids, and improved leaf photosynthesis (Pn) and dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend plastic mulching with furrow-bed seeding for cotton production in saline soils.

Outcome
use of plastic mulching plus furrow‐bed seedinge0
Qualifier
in saline soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of plastic mulching plus furrow‐bed seeding would be a suitable cultural practice for enhancing cotton production in saline soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.