Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased lint yield in 2003 versus flat seeding without mulch.

A claim from Furrow Seeding with Plastic Mulching Increases Stand Establishment and Lint Yield of Cotton in a Saline Field · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow seeding with plastic mulch increased lint yield in 2003 versus flat seeding without mulch.

Treatment
furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
2003e0
Comparator
flat‐seeded cotton without mulchinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow‐seeded cotton under plastic mulching increased stand establishment and lint yield by 103 and 25% in 2003, and 92 and 22% in 2004, compared with flat‐seeded cotton without mulching, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–965
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91

Title

Furrow Seeding with Plastic Mulching Increases Stand Establishment and Lint Yield of Cotton in a Saline Field

Hezhong Dong; Weijiang Li; Wei Tang; et al. Agronomy Journal 2008. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0074

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-4bfb281398a2bb70555789337f2919a059aac007b87b0f2cad3c128503b36c65 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

mulching · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this claim · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.