Paper · 1977 · Crop Science

Effects of Irrigation History on Responses of Cotton to Subsequent Water Stress1

J. M. Cutler; D. W. Rains

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
75
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that the internal water relations and stomatal and growth responses to water status of cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’) can be modified by prior tissue water deficits. Different levels of stress conditioning were achieved by varying irrigation frequency during a pretreatment period. Growth was limited by water stress under conditions of low and moderate irrigation frequency during the pretreatment period. During the final drought period, tissue water desorption characteristics, stomatal closure thresholds, and (inferentially) turgor sensitivity were different in stress‐conditioned plants from those in plants not subjected to prior stress. Analysis of the relationships of water potential to relative water content suggested that osmotic adjustment might play a role in the reduced sensitivity of hardened plants. The altered behaviors of prestressed plants were in the right direction to explain differences observed between the responses of controlled. environment and field‐grown plants and suggest that stress‐conditioned plants are less sensitive to tissue water deficits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and moderate irrigation frequency limited cotton growth during pretreatment.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
low and moderate irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was limited by water stress under conditions of low and moderate irrigation frequency during the pretreatment period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress conditioning changed tissue water desorption characteristics during final drought.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
stress‐conditioned plantse0
Outcome
tissue water desorption characteristicse0
Direction
differente0
Qualifier
During the final drought periode0
Comparator
plants not subjected to prior stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the final drought period, tissue water desorption characteristics, stomatal closure thresholds, and (inferentially) turgor sensitivity were different in stress‐conditioned plants from those in plants not subjected to prior stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress conditioning changed stomatal closure thresholds during final drought.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
stress‐conditioned plantse0
Outcome
stomatal closure thresholdse0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
plants not subjected to prior stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the final drought period, tissue water desorption characteristics, stomatal closure thresholds, and (inferentially) turgor sensitivity were different in stress‐conditioned plants from those in plants not subjected to prior stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress conditioning inferentially changed turgor sensitivity during final drought.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
stress‐conditioned plantse0
Outcome
turgor sensitivitye0
Direction
differente0
Qualifier
inferentiallye0
Comparator
plants not subjected to prior stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the final drought period, tissue water desorption characteristics, stomatal closure thresholds, and (inferentially) turgor sensitivity were different in stress‐conditioned plants from those in plants not subjected to prior stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water potential relationships suggested osmotic adjustment might contribute to reduced sensitivity of hardened cotton.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
reduced sensitivity of hardened plantse0
Qualifier
osmotic adjustment might play a rolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of the relationships of water potential to relative water content suggested that osmotic adjustment might play a role in the reduced sensitivity of hardened plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest conditioned cotton plants are less sensitive to tissue water deficits.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
sensitive to tissue water deficitse0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress‐conditioned plants are less sensitive to tissue water deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton plants ( Gossypium hirsutum , ‘Acala SJ 2’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–186 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.