Paper · 1985 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Plant Morphological and Biochemical Responses to Field Water Deficits

John J. Burke; Patricia E. Gamble; Jerry L. Hatfield; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
112
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plants grown under dryland conditions exhibited a 40 to 85% decrease in leaf number, leaf area index, leaf size, plant height, and total weight per plant. Gross photosynthesis decreased from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per second and the average midday water, osmotic, and turgor potentials decreased to -2.1, -2.4, and 0.3 megapascals, respectively.There was a progressive increase in glutathione reductase activity and in the cellular antioxidant system in the leaves of stressed plants compared to the irrigated controls. The stress-induced increases in enzyme activity occurred at all canopy positions analyzed.Irrigation of the dryland plots following severe water stress resulted in a 50% increase in leaf area per gram fresh weight in newly expanded leaves of both strains over the leaves which had expanded under the dryland conditions. Paraquat resistance (a relative measure of the cellular antioxidant system) decreased in the strain T25 following irrigation. Glutathione reductase activities remained elevated in the T25 and T185 leaves which were expanded fully prior to irrigation and in the leaves which expanded following the irrigation treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland conditions decreased leaf number, leaf area index and leaf size of field cotton by 40 to 85%.

Treatment
dryland conditionse2
Outcome
leaf number, leaf area index, leaf sizee2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
40 to 85%e2
Setting
field-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown under dryland conditions exhibited a 40 to 85% decrease in leaf number, leaf area index, leaf size, plant height, and total weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland conditions decreased plant height and total weight per plant of field cotton by 40 to 85%.

Treatment
dryland conditionse2
Outcome
plant height, and total weight per plante2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
40 to 85%e2
Setting
field-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown under dryland conditions exhibited a 40 to 85% decrease in leaf number, leaf area index, leaf size, plant height, and total weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross photosynthesis decreased under water deficits in cotton, from 0.81 to 0.47 mg CO2 per square meter per second.

Treatment
water deficitse1
Outcome
Gross photosynthesise3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per seconde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“Gross photosynthesis decreased from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per second and the average midday water, osmotic, and turgor potentials decreased to -2.1, -2.4, and 0.3 megapascals, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average midday water potential decreased under water deficits in cotton, to -2.1 MPa.

Treatment
water deficitse1
Outcome
average midday watere3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
-2.1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“Gross photosynthesis decreased from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per second and the average midday water, osmotic, and turgor potentials decreased to -2.1, -2.4, and 0.3 megapascals, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average midday osmotic potential decreased under water deficits in cotton, to -2.4 MPa.

Treatment
water deficitse1
Outcome
osmotice3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
-2.4e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“Gross photosynthesis decreased from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per second and the average midday water, osmotic, and turgor potentials decreased to -2.1, -2.4, and 0.3 megapascals, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average midday turgor potential decreased under water deficits in cotton, to 0.3 MPa.

Treatment
water deficitse1
Outcome
turgore3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
0.3 megapascalse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“Gross photosynthesis decreased from 0.81 to 0.47 milligram CO(2) fixed per meter per second and the average midday water, osmotic, and turgor potentials decreased to -2.1, -2.4, and 0.3 megapascals, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits progressively increased glutathione reductase activity and the cellular antioxidant system in cotton leaves compared to irrigated controls, at all canopy positions.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
water deficitse1
Outcome
glutathione reductase activity and in the cellular antioxidant systeme4
Direction
increasee4
Qualifier
at all canopy positions analyzede5
Comparator
irrigated controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was a progressive increase in glutathione reductase activity and in the cellular antioxidant system in the leaves of stressed plants compared to the irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–697 · show in text ↑
e5

“The stress-induced increases in enzyme activity occurred at all canopy positions analyzed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation after severe water stress increased leaf area per gram fresh weight by 50% in newly expanded cotton leaves over leaves expanded under dryland conditions.

Organ / stage
newly expanded leavese6
Treatment
Irrigation of the dryland plots following severe water stresse6
Outcome
leaf area per gram fresh weighte6
Direction
increasee6
Value
50%e6
Comparator
the leaves which had expanded under the dryland conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e6

“Irrigation of the dryland plots following severe water stress resulted in a 50% increase in leaf area per gram fresh weight in newly expanded leaves of both strains over the leaves which had expanded under the dryland conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat resistance decreased in cotton strain T25 following irrigation.

Material
T25e7
Treatment
irrigatione7
Outcome
Paraquat resistancee7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e7

“Paraquat resistance (a relative measure of the cellular antioxidant system) decreased in the strain T25 following irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione reductase activities remained elevated in cotton strains T25 and T185 after the irrigation treatment.

Material
T25 and T185e0
Organ / stage
leaves which were expanded fully prior to irrigatione0
Treatment
the irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
Glutathione reductase activitiese0
Direction
remained elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of water deficits on plant morphology and biochemistry were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glutathione reductase activities remained elevated in the T25 and T185 leaves which were expanded fully prior to irrigation and in the leaves which expanded following the irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1336 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

36 papers: 14 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Adapted leaves reached zero turgor at lower water potential than unstressed plants.

    Osmoregulation in Cotton in Response to Water Stress · 1981 · compared with plants that had never experienced a water stress

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

irrigation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 7 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.