Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drought stress reduced total phenols, total soluble proteins and catalase activity in cotton compared with control

A claim from Effect of Sodium Niroprusside, Putrescine and Glycine Betaine on Alleviation of Drought Stress in Cotton Plant · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced total phenols, total soluble proteins and catalase activity in cotton compared with control

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
total phenols, total soluble proteins and catalase activitye1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton plants pre-treated with three concentrations of SNP (0.05, 0.1 and 1 mM), Put (200, 400 and 600 ppm) or GB (400, 600 and 800 ppm) then exposed to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–436
e1

“In general, the drought stress reduced the growth characters, yield characters, pigments, total soluble sugars, total free amino acids, total phenols, total soluble proteins and catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–633
e2

“while increased proline content, total antioxidant capacity and peroxidase activity in comparison with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–745

Title

Effect of Sodium Niroprusside, Putrescine and Glycine Betaine on Alleviation of Drought Stress in Cotton Plant

M. Shallan; Alshaimaa A. Ibrahim 2012

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-19da2e47f4b0a51ee2726dd991ffeecfd7381a1f10597fe922a899f832b4cdca · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.