Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of water stress and non-stress conditions on cotton yield and fiber quality properties. A two-year field study was carried out at the Southeastern Anatolia Agricultural Research Institute (SAARI), in 2009 and 2010, with the aim of evaluating 12 cotton genotypes for yield and fiber quality properties under irrigated and water stress conditions. The experiment was laid out as a randomized split block design (RSBD) with four replications. Significant differences were observed among genotypes and water treatments for seed cotton yield, fiber yield, ginning percentage and all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity. Yield differences among genotypes under water stress and non-stress conditions were higher during the first season. In both years, SER-18 and Stoneville 468 cotton genotypes produced higher yield under water stress conditions, while Stoneville 468 produced higher yield under well-irrigated conditions. The results during the two years indicated that seed cotton yield decreased (48.04%) and fiber yield decreased (49.41%), due to water stress. Ginning percentage and fiber quality properties were also negatively affected by water stress treatment. Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fineness and fiber elongation were decreased, while fiber uniformity was not affected by water stress treatment. Key words: Cotton, yield, fiber quality properties, water stress, non-stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes and water treatments differed significantly for seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Material
- genotypese0
- Treatment
- water treatmentse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among genotypes and water treatments for seed cotton yield, fiber yield, ginning percentage and all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes and water treatments differed significantly for fiber yield.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Treatment
- water treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fiber yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among genotypes and water treatments for seed cotton yield, fiber yield, ginning percentage and all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes and water treatments differed significantly for ginning percentage.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Treatment
- water treatmentse0
- Outcome
- ginning percentagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among genotypes and water treatments for seed cotton yield, fiber yield, ginning percentage and all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes and water treatments differed significantly for all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Treatment
- water treatmentse0
- Outcome
- all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were observed among genotypes and water treatments for seed cotton yield, fiber yield, ginning percentage and all fiber quality properties except fiber uniformity.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences among genotypes were greater in the first season.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Outcome
- Yield differencese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- first seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield differences among genotypes under water stress and non-stress conditions were higher during the first season.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SER-18 had higher yield under water stress conditions.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- SER-18e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- water stress conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both years, SER-18 and Stoneville 468 cotton genotypes produced higher yield under water stress conditions, while Stoneville 468 produced higher yield under well-irrigated conditions.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stoneville 468 had higher yield under water stress conditions.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- Stoneville 468e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- water stress conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both years, SER-18 and Stoneville 468 cotton genotypes produced higher yield under water stress conditions, while Stoneville 468 produced higher yield under well-irrigated conditions.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stoneville 468 had higher yield under well-irrigated conditions.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- Stoneville 468e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- well-irrigated conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both years, SER-18 and Stoneville 468 cotton genotypes produced higher yield under water stress conditions, while Stoneville 468 produced higher yield under well-irrigated conditions.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decreased seed cotton yield by 48.04%.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stresse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 48.04%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results during the two years indicated that seed cotton yield decreased (48.04%) and fiber yield decreased (49.41%), due to water stress.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decreased fiber yield by 49.41%.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stresse0
- Outcome
- fiber yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 49.41%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results during the two years indicated that seed cotton yield decreased (48.04%) and fiber yield decreased (49.41%), due to water stress.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress negatively affected ginning percentage.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stress treatmente0
- Outcome
- Ginning percentagee0
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ginning percentage and fiber quality properties were also negatively affected by water stress treatment.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decreased Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fineness.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stress treatmente0
- Outcome
- Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber finenesse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fineness and fiber elongation were decreased, while fiber uniformity was not affected by water stress treatment.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decreased fiber elongation.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stress treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber elongatione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fineness and fiber elongation were decreased, while fiber uniformity was not affected by water stress treatment.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress did not affect fiber uniformity.
- Taxon
- cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- water stress treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber uniformitye0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fineness and fiber elongation were decreased, while fiber uniformity was not affected by water stress treatment.”
t0“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
drought · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.