Paper · 2001 · African Crop Science Journal

Influence of rate and frequency of Ridomil plus applications on late blight severity and potato yields in Cameroon

D. A. Fontem

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of Ridomil Plus® (12% metalaxyl + 60% cuprous oxide) spray rate and frequency on the severity of potato late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans, was evaluated during 1997 and 1999 in Dschang, Cameroon. A randomised complete block design was used in both experiments. In 1997, plots were sprayed with 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, or 4.8 kg a.i.ha-1 of Ridomil Plus®, while in 1999, they were treated once, twice or thrice with 2.4 kg a.i.ha-1 of the fungicide. In both trials control plots were not sprayed. Late blight intensity was recorded weekly and yields were obtained at harvest. Fungicide applications reduced late blight intensity and consequently increased potato tuber yields. Marketable yields were significantly higher in the resistant variety, Cipira (22.4 - 34.8 t ha-1), than in the susceptible variety, Tezelfeu (4.0 - 12.0 t ha-1). A significant quadratic relationship existed between the rate or number of fungicide applications and tuber yields. Economic analyses indicated that two sprays of the fungicide at 2.4 kg a.i. ha-1 are necessary for a good late blight protection programme in potato. This spray regime resulted to increases in net returns of US$ 1947 to 3327 ha-1. Results also suggest that high rates or frequencies of fungicide applications do not necessarily lead to better economic benefits. Key Words: Economic gains, fungicide application, Phytophthora infestans, Solanum tuberosum (African Crop Science Journal 2001 9(1): 235-244)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applications reduced potato late blight intensity.

Treatment
Fungicide applicationse0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse1pathogen
Outcome
late blight intensitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide applications reduced late blight intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–641 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–160 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applications increased potato tuber yields.

Treatment
Fungicide applicationse0
Outcome
potato tuber yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide applications reduced late blight intensity and consequently increased potato tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yields were higher in resistant Cipira than susceptible Tezelfeu.

Material
Cipirae0
Outcome
Marketable yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.4 - 34.8 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
4.0 - 12.0 t ha-1e0
Comparator
Tezelfeue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yields were significantly higher in the resistant variety, Cipira (22.4 - 34.8 t ha-1), than in the susceptible variety, Tezelfeu (4.0 - 12.0 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber yields had a significant quadratic relationship with fungicide rate or application number.

Treatment
fungicide applicationse0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Qualifier
quadratic relationshipe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant quadratic relationship existed between the rate or number of fungicide applications and tuber yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays at 2.4 kg a.i. ha-1 were recommended for potato late blight protection.

Treatment
two sprays of the fungicide at 2.4 kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
good late blight protection programmee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two sprays of the fungicide at 2.4 kg a.i. ha-1 are necessary for a good late blight protection programme in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two spray regime increased net returns by US$ 1947 to 3327 ha-1.

Treatment
This spray regimee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
US$ 1947 to 3327 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This spray regime resulted to increases in net returns of US$ 1947 to 3327 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fungicide rates or frequencies did not necessarily improve economic benefits.

Treatment
high rates or frequencies of fungicide applicationse0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
do not necessarily lead to bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rates or frequencies of fungicide applications do not necessarily lead to better economic benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.