Paper · 2012 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Bio-fortification of potato tubers using foliar zinc-fertiliser

Philip J. White; Martin R. Broadley; John P. Hammond; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryWorldwide, many people are zinc (Zn)-deficient. Dietary Zn intake can be increased by producing crops with higher concentrations of Zn in their edible portions. This can be achieved by applying Zn-fertilisers to varieties with an increased ability to acquire Zn and to accumulate Zn in their edible portions. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important food crop and is, therefore, a target for bio-fortification with Zn. Field trials incorporating a core collection of 23 potato genotypes, performed over 4 years (2006 – 2009), indicated significant genotypic effects on tuber Zn concentration and suggested that tuber Zn concentration was influenced by environmental effects, but also found that genotype × environment (G × E) interactions were not significant. Tuber Zn concentrations averaged 10.8 mg kg–1 dry matter (DM), and the ratio between the lowest and the highest varietal tuber Zn-concentration averaged 1.76. Tuber Zn concentrations could be increased by foliar Zn-fertilisation. Tuber yields of ‘Maris Piper’ were unaffected by foliar applications of < 1.08 g Zn plant–1. The relationship between tuber Zn concentration and foliar Zn application followed a saturation curve, reaching a maximum at approx. 30 mg Zn kg–1 DM at a foliar Zn application rate of 1.08 g plant–1. Despite a 40-fold increase in shoot Zn concentration compared to the unfertilised controls following foliar Zn-fertilisation with 2.16 g Zn plant–1, only a doubling in tuber Zn concentration was observed. This suggests that the bio-fortification of tubers with Zn was restricted by the limited mobility of Zn in the phloem. A significant positive linear relationship between tuber Zn concentration and tuber N concentration supported the hypothesis of co-transport of Zn and N-compounds in the phloem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato genotype significantly affected tuber zinc concentration.

Material
genotypice0
Outcome
tuber Zn concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant genotypic effects on tuber Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment influenced tuber zinc concentration.

Outcome
tuber Zn concentratione0
Setting
environmentale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tuber Zn concentration was influenced by environmental effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interaction for tuber zinc concentration was not significant.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
genotype × environment (G × E) interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype × environment (G × E) interactions were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean tuber zinc concentration was 10.8 mg kg–1 dry matter.

Outcome
Tuber Zn concentrationse0
Value
10.8 mg kg–1 dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber Zn concentrations averaged 10.8 mg kg–1 dry matter (DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average ratio of lowest to highest varietal tuber zinc concentration was 1.76.

Outcome
ratio between the lowest and the highest varietal tuber Zn-concentratione0
Value
1.76e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ratio between the lowest and the highest varietal tuber Zn-concentration averaged 1.76”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc fertilization increased tuber zinc concentration.

Treatment
foliar Zn-fertilisatione0
Outcome
Tuber Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber Zn concentrations could be increased by foliar Zn-fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc below 1.08 g per plant did not significantly affect Maris Piper tuber yield.

Material
Maris Pipere0
Treatment
foliar applications of < 1.08 g Zn plant–1e0
Outcome
Tuber yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber yields of ‘Maris Piper’ were unaffected by foliar applications of < 1.08 g Zn plant–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber zinc concentration saturated near 30 mg Zn kg–1 DM at 1.08 g per plant foliar zinc.

Treatment
foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
tuber Zn concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
approx. 30 mg Zn kg–1 DMe0
Qualifier
1.08 g plant–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relationship between tuber Zn concentration and foliar Zn application followed a saturation curve, reaching a maximum at approx. 30 mg Zn kg–1 DM at a foliar Zn application rate of 1.08 g plant–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc at 2.16 g per plant increased shoot zinc concentration fortyfold versus controls.

Treatment
foliar Zn-fertilisation with 2.16 g Zn plant–1e0
Outcome
shoot Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40-folde0
Comparator
unfertilised controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40-fold increase in shoot Zn concentration compared to the unfertilised controls following foliar Zn-fertilisation with 2.16 g Zn plant–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilization only doubled tuber zinc concentration.

Treatment
foliar Zn-fertilisation with 2.16 g Zn plant–1e0
Outcome
tuber Zn concentratione0
Direction
doublinge0
Value
doublinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar Zn-fertilisation with 2.16 g Zn plant–1, only a doubling in tuber Zn concentration was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Limited phloem mobility of zinc was proposed to restrict tuber zinc biofortification.

Outcome
bio-fortification of tubers with Zne0
Direction
restrictede0
Qualifier
limited mobility of Zn in the phloeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio-fortification of tubers with Zn was restricted by the limited mobility of Zn in the phloem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber zinc concentration was significantly positively related to tuber nitrogen concentration.

Compound
tuber N concentratione0
Outcome
tuber Zn concentratione0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive linear relationship between tuber Zn concentration and tuber N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1720 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The zinc and nitrogen association supports their co-transport in phloem.

Outcome
co-transport of Zn and N-compoundse0
Qualifier
in the phloeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supported the hypothesis of co-transport of Zn and N-compounds in the phloem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

46 papers: 46 positive, 0 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.