Paper · 1999 · Agronomy Journal

Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield and Quality

Jorge A. Cusicanqui; Joseph G. Lauer

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
131
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrid selection and plant density are important management considerations for successful forage production in dairy and livestock operations. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the effect of plant density on high‐ and low‐quality corn hybrids and (ii) to describe the economic trade‐off between plant density and forage yield and quality. Two adapted hybrids selected for high and low quality characteristics were grown in the field at five plant densities ranging from 44 500 to 104 500 plants ha −1 at six locations in Wisconsin during 1994, 1995, and 1996. Forage quality response among hybrids was similar across the range of plant densities evaluated. As plant density increased, dry matter yield increased 1.7 to 4.1 Mg ha −1 , depending on location. Maximum dry matter yields were observed at 97 300 to 102 200 harvested plants ha −1 . In vitro true digestibility decreased 16 to 23 g kg −1 as plant density increased. Crude protein decreased 6 to 8 g kg −1 as plant density increased. Neutral‐detergent fiber increased 20 to 35 g kg −1 , and acid‐detergent fiber increased 19 to 29 g kg −1 with increasing plant density. A trade‐off exists between yield and quality for corn forage. Milk Mg −1 decreased 98 to 143 kg milk Mg −1 with increasing plant densities, but milk ha −1 increased 926 to 2176 kg milk ha −1 until about 75 000 to 85 000 harvested plants ha −1 , and did not change with higher plant densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid forage quality responded similarly across planting densities.

Outcome
Forage quality response among hybrids was similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage quality response among hybrids was similar across the range of plant densities evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density raised dry matter yield by 1.7 to 4.1 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
plant density increasede0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.7 to 4.1 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
depending on locatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As plant density increased, dry matter yield increased 1.7 to 4.1 Mg ha −1 , depending on location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum dry matter yield occurred at 97 300 to 102 200 plants per hectare.

Outcome
dry matter yieldse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
97 300 to 102 200 harvested plants ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum dry matter yields were observed at 97 300 to 102 200 harvested plants ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro digestibility fell by 16 to 23 g per kg as density increased.

Treatment
plant density increasede0
Outcome
In vitro true digestibilitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16 to 23 g kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro true digestibility decreased 16 to 23 g kg −1 as plant density increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein fell by 6 to 8 g per kg as density increased.

Treatment
plant density increasede0
Outcome
Crude proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
6 to 8 g kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein decreased 6 to 8 g kg −1 as plant density increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber rose by 20 to 35 g per kg as density increased.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
Neutral‐detergent fibere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 to 35 g kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neutral‐detergent fiber increased 20 to 35 g kg −1 , and acid‐detergent fiber increased 19 to 29 g kg −1 with increasing plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid detergent fiber rose by 19 to 29 g per kg as density increased.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
acid‐detergent fibere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19 to 29 g kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neutral‐detergent fiber increased 20 to 35 g kg −1 , and acid‐detergent fiber increased 19 to 29 g kg −1 with increasing plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk per Mg of forage fell by 98 to 143 kg as density increased.

Treatment
increasing plant densitiese0
Outcome
Milk Mg −1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
98 to 143 kg milk Mg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milk Mg −1 decreased 98 to 143 kg milk Mg −1 with increasing plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk yield per hectare rose by 926 to 2176 kg up to 75 000 to 85 000 plants per hectare.

Treatment
75 000 to 85 000 harvested plants ha −1e0
Outcome
milk ha −1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
926 to 2176 kg milk ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“milk ha −1 increased 926 to 2176 kg milk ha −1 until about 75 000 to 85 000 harvested plants ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk yield per hectare did not change at higher densities.

Treatment
higher plant densitiese0
Outcome
milk ha −1e1
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not change with higher plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1457 · show in text ↑
e1

“milk ha −1 increased 926 to 2176 kg milk ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1356 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑

density · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 19 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

density · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 34 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.