Paper · 1991 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effect of soil acidity on barley production in the south-west of Western Australia. 2. Cereal genotypes and their response to lime

PJ Dolling; WM Porter; AD Robson

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of aluminium (Al) toxicity of either surface or subsurface soil on the growth of barley, and the potential for variation in response to soil acidity among agronomically adapted Australian barley genotypes, were examined at 13 sites. The effect of Al toxicity was investigated by plant analysis, using 3-5 lime application rates and Al-tolerant species (wheat, triticale), as well as barley. All cereals were supplied with complete nutrients. To measure the potential for response variation, grain yields of 14 genotypes of barley, relative to cv. Stirling, were related to soil pH at 7 sites. Grain yield of barley was increased 9-30% at 6 sites, by lime application alleviating A1 toxicity. The yield of triticale and wheat cv. Aroona was not increased by lime application at any site. There was some indication that subsurface acidity may be reducing the grain yield of barley at sites with CaCl2-extractable Al concentrations of 23-4 mg/g in the A2 horizon. Some barley genotypes appeared to be more tolerant than Stirling to soil acidity. Aluminium toxicity appears to be reducing barley grain yields by more than 10% at surface soil pH <4.5 (0.01 mol CaCl2/L), or when CaCl2-extractable Al is >3-4 mg/g. CaCl2-extractable A1 in the surface soil was not a better indicator of Al toxicity than soil pH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased barley grain yield by 9-30% at six sites by alleviating aluminium toxicity.

Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9-30%e0
Qualifier
alleviating A1 toxicitye0
Setting
6 sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of barley was increased 9-30% at 6 sites, by lime application alleviating A1 toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale grain yield was not increased by lime application at any site.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
lime applicatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
not increasede1
Setting
any sitee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield of triticale and wheat cv. Aroona was not increased by lime application at any site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cv. Aroona grain yield was not increased by lime application at any site.

Material
cv. Aroonae1
Treatment
lime applicatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
not increasede1
Setting
any sitee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield of triticale and wheat cv. Aroona was not increased by lime application at any site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–796 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some barley genotypes appeared more tolerant to soil acidity than cv. Stirling.

Material
barley genotypese2
Outcome
soil aciditye2
Direction
more tolerante2
Comparator
Stirlinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Some barley genotypes appeared to be more tolerant than Stirling to soil acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1052 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface acidity may be reducing barley grain yield where CaCl2-extractable Al is high in the A2 horizon.

Treatment
subsurface aciditye3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducinge3
Qualifier
CaCl2-extractable Al concentrations of 23-4 mg/g in the A2 horizone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“There was some indication that subsurface acidity may be reducing the grain yield of barley at sites with CaCl2-extractable Al concentrations of 23-4 mg/g in the A2 horizon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–970 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium toxicity appears to reduce barley grain yield by more than 10% at surface soil pH below 4.5 or when CaCl2-extractable Al exceeds 3-4 mg/g.

Treatment
Aluminium toxicitye4
Outcome
barley grain yieldse4
Direction
reducinge4
Value
more than 10%e4
Qualifier
at surface soil pH <4.5 (0.01 mol CaCl2/L), or when CaCl2-extractable Al is >3-4 mg/ge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Aluminium toxicity appears to be reducing barley grain yields by more than 10% at surface soil pH <4.5 (0.01 mol CaCl2/L), or when CaCl2-extractable Al is >3-4 mg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1218 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2-extractable Al in the surface soil was not a better indicator of Al toxicity than soil pH.

Outcome
indicator of Al toxicitye5
Comparator
soil pHe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of barley was increased 9-30% at 6 sites, by lime application alleviating A1 toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–701 · show in text ↑
e5

“CaCl2-extractable A1 in the surface soil was not a better indicator of Al toxicity than soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1315 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

lime · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.