Paper · 2014 · Agricultural Sciences

Monitoring Heat Waves and Their Impacts on Summer Crop Development in Southern Brazil

Anibal Gusso; Jorge Ricardo Ducati; Mauricio Roberto Veronez; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Periods in the soybean summer cycle that are sensitive to the occurrence of high temperatures were studied. An analysis was performed on the variability of soybean yields associated with crop canopy temperatures during key development periods. A land surface temperature (LST) data series from MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) on the Aqua satellite was processed between 2003 and 2012 that covered the entire state of Rio Grande do Sul, in Brazil. Enhanced vegetation index (EVI) data from MODIS on the Terra satellite were used to monitor the LST during different phenological stages. Spatially interpolated maps of soybean yield distributions were generated using data obtained from Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) at state and municipality levels. The results indicate that canopy-LST occurrence in mid-February, during the grain filling, is most correlated to yield reduction (R2 = 0.82 and RMSD = 14.4%). At the state level, the average yield is 2003 kg·ha-1 with a standard deviation of 308 kg·ha-1. The overall average of the canopy-LST is 305.0 K (31.8°C) with a standard deviation of 1.9 K. The slope of the downward linear relationship between canopy-LST and yield was -28.7%. These results indicate that monitoring heat wave events can provide important information for characterising agriculture vulnerability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-February canopy temperature during grain filling was most correlated with yield reduction (R2 = 0.82; RMSD = 14.4%).

Organ / stage
grain fillinge0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
R2 = 0.82 and RMSD = 14.4%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“canopy-LST occurrence in mid-February, during the grain filling, is most correlated to yield reduction (R2 = 0.82 and RMSD = 14.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

State-level average soybean yield was 2003 kg·ha-1, with standard deviation 308 kg·ha-1.

Outcome
average yielde0
Value
2003 kg·ha-1e0
Qualifier
standard deviation of 308 kg·ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the state level, the average yield is 2003 kg·ha-1 with a standard deviation of 308 kg·ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall mean canopy temperature was 305.0 K (31.8°C), with standard deviation 1.9 K.

Outcome
average of the canopy-LSTe0
Value
305.0 K (31.8°C)e0
Qualifier
standard deviation of 1.9 Ke0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The overall average of the canopy-LST is 305.0 K (31.8°C) with a standard deviation of 1.9 K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature and soybean yield had a downward linear relationship with slope -28.7%.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
downwarde0
Value
-28.7%e0
Setting
canopy-LSTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The slope of the downward linear relationship between canopy-LST and yield was -28.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1229 · show in text ↑