Paper · 2002 · Annals of Botany

Leaf Structural and Photosynthetic Characteristics, and Biomass Allocation to Foliage in Relation to Foliar Nitrogen Content and Tree Size in Three Betula Species

U. NIINEMETS

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Young trees 0.03-1.7 m high of three coexisting Betula species were investigated in four sites of varying soil fertility, but all in full daylight, to separate nutrient and plant size controls on leaf dry mass per unit area (MA), light-saturated foliar photosynthetic electron transport rate (J) and the fraction of plant biomass in foliage (F(L)). Because the site effect was generally non-significant in the analyses of variance with foliar nitrogen content per unit dry mass (N(M)) as a covariate, N(M) was used as an explaining variable of leaf structural and physiological characteristics. Average leaf area (S) and dry mass per leaf scaled positively with N(M) and total tree height (H) in all species. Leaf dry mass per unit area also increased with increasing H, but decreased with increasing N(M), whereas the effects were species-specific. Increases in plant size led to a lower and increases in N(M) to a greater FL and total plant foliar area per unit plant biomass (LAR). Thus, the self-shading probably increased with increasing N(M) and decreased with increasing H. Nevertheless, the whole-plant average M(A), as well as M(A) values of topmost fully exposed leaves, correlated with N(M) and H in a similar manner, indicating that scaling of MA with N(M) and H did not necessarily result from the modified degree of within-plant shading. The rate of photosynthetic electron transport per unit dry mass (J(M)) scaled positively with N(M), but decreased with increasing H and M(A). Thus, increases in M(A) with tree height and decreasing nitrogen content not only resulted in a lower plant foliar area (LAR = F(L)/M(A)), but also led to lower physiological activity of unit foliar biomass. The leaf parameters (J(M), N(M) and M(A)) varied threefold, but the whole-plant characteristic FL varied 20-fold and LAR 30-fold, indicating that the biomass allocation was more plastically adjusted to different plant internal nitrogen contents and to tree height than the foliar variables. Our results demonstrate that: (1) tree height and N(M) may independently control foliar structure and physiology, and have an even greater impact on biomass allocation; and (2) the modified within-plant light availabilities alone do not explain the observed patterns. Although there were interspecific differences with respect to the statistical significance of the relationships, all species generally fit common regressions. However, these differences were consistent, and suggested that more competitive species with inherently larger growth rates also more plastically respond to N and H.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area and dry mass per leaf increased with foliar nitrogen and tree height in all three Betula species.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Average leaf area (S) and dry mass per leafe0
Direction
scaled positivelye0
Qualifier
in all speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average leaf area (S) and dry mass per leaf scaled positively with N(M) and total tree height (H) in all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry mass per area increased with tree height.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
Leaf dry mass per unit areae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increasing He0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf dry mass per unit area also increased with increasing H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry mass per area decreased with foliar nitrogen.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
Leaf dry mass per unit areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
increasing N(M)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf dry mass per unit area also increased with increasing H, but decreased with increasing N(M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger plants had lower foliage biomass fraction and foliar area per plant biomass.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
FL and total plant foliar area per unit plant biomass (LAR)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Increases in plant sizee0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in plant size led to a lower and increases in N(M) to a greater FL and total plant foliar area per unit plant biomass (LAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater foliar nitrogen was associated with greater foliage biomass fraction and foliar area per plant biomass.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
FL and total plant foliar area per unit plant biomass (LAR)e0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
increases in N(M)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in N(M) to a greater FL and total plant foliar area per unit plant biomass (LAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole plant and exposed leaf M(A) correlated similarly with nitrogen and height.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
whole-plant average M(A), as well as M(A) values of topmost fully exposed leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the whole-plant average M(A), as well as M(A) values of topmost fully exposed leaves, correlated with N(M) and H in a similar manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport per dry mass rose with foliar nitrogen.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
rate of photosynthetic electron transport per unit dry mass (J(M))e0
Direction
scaled positivelye0
Qualifier
N(M)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of photosynthetic electron transport per unit dry mass (J(M)) scaled positively with N(M)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport per dry mass decreased as height and leaf mass per area increased.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
rate of photosynthetic electron transport per unit dry mass (J(M))e1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
increasing H and M(A)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but decreased with increasing H and M(A)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1492 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of photosynthetic electron transport per unit dry mass (J(M))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf traits varied threefold, while foliage fraction varied 20-fold and leaf area ratio 30-fold.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
leaf parameters (J(M), N(M) and M(A))e0
Value
threefolde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf parameters (J(M), N(M) and M(A)) varied threefold, but the whole-plant characteristic FL varied 20-fold and LAR 30-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliage biomass fraction varied 20-fold.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
whole-plant characteristic FLe0
Value
20-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whole-plant characteristic FL varied 20-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area ratio varied 30-fold.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
LARe0
Value
30-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAR 30-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific differences in relationship significance were consistent and suggested faster growing species respond more plastically to nitrogen and height.

Taxon
BetulaBetulat0
Outcome
more plastically respond to N and He0
Qualifier
more competitive species with inherently larger growth ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula
Betula · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShi Annan · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences were consistent, and suggested that more competitive species with inherently larger growth rates also more plastically respond to N and H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2429–2584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑