Paper · 1997 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Allelopathic effects ofChenopodium albumL. andChenopodium polyspermumL. on another weed and two crop species

C. F. Reinhardt; Ruth Meissner; L. J. van Wyk

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium polyspermum L. are cosmopolitan weeds that often cause serious crop yield losses. Although it is well known that both species compete strongly with crops, nothing has been published on their relative allelopathic potentials. Experiments for assessing the allelopathic effects of C. album and C. polyspermum on three indicator species were conducted under controlled conditions. The indicator species were sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. SO 222), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Heinz 1370) and the cosmopolitan weed Indian goosegrass (Eleusine indica subsp. indica (L.) Gaertn.). Top growth of mature C. album and C. polyspermum plants was freeze-dried, milled to a coarse powder and gamma-irradiated. Steam-sterilized soil was mixed with the powdered material to reach a concentration of 1% for each donor species. The control treatments consisted of an untreated soil and the same soil containing 1% extracted material of the donor species. Only sunflower and tomato showed significant growth reduction in soil containing C. album material. The emergence of tomato was significantly poorer on soil containing C. album material. C. polyspermum inhibited the growth of only sunflower seedlings. In another experiment the effects of three concentrations of each of hexane, ethyl acetate and MeOH:H2O extracts of C. album and C. polyspermum on tomato seed germination were investigated. A concentration of 8 mg ml1 of the 50:50 MeOH:H2O extractable fraction from C. album material significantly inhibited germination. Extracts of C. polyspermum did not affect germination of tomato seed significantly. Results showed that C. album, and to a lesser extent C. polyspermum, have growth-inhibiting allelopathic effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. album material significantly reduced sunflower growth.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
C. album materiale0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only sunflower and tomato showed significant growth reduction in soil containing C. album material.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. album material significantly reduced tomato growth.

Treatment
C. album materiale0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only sunflower and tomato showed significant growth reduction in soil containing C. album material.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. album material significantly reduced tomato emergence.

Treatment
C. album materiale0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
emergence of tomatoe0
Direction
poorere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The emergence of tomato was significantly poorer on soil containing C. album material.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. polyspermum inhibited sunflower seedling growth.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
C. polyspermume0
Interactor
C. polyspermumLipandra polyspermae0weed
Outcome
growth of only sunflower seedlingse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipandra polysperma
Lipandra polysperma · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. polyspermum inhibited the growth of only sunflower seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 mg ml1, the 50:50 MeOH:H2O fraction from C. album significantly inhibited tomato seed germination.

Treatment
8 mg ml1 of the 50:50 MeOH:H2O extractable fraction from C. album materiale0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In another experiment the effects of three concentrations of each of hexane, ethyl acetate and MeOH:H2O extracts of C. album and C. polyspermum on tomato seed germination were investigated. A concentration of 8 mg ml1 of the 50:50 MeOH:H2O extractable fraction from C. album material significantly inhibited germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. polyspermum extracts did not significantly affect tomato seed germination.

Treatment
Extracts of C. polyspermume0
Interactor
C. polyspermumLipandra polyspermae0weed
Outcome
germination of tomato seede0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipandra polysperma
Lipandra polysperma · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts of C. polyspermum did not affect germination of tomato seed significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1649 · show in text ↑

methanol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Chenopodium album · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 203 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.