Paper · 2012 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of N Management on Yield and N Uptake of Rice in Central China

Sheng-gang PAN; Sheng-qi HUANG; Jing ZHAI; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Efficient N fertilizer management is critical for the economic production of rice and the long-term protection of environmental quality. A field experiment was designed to study the effects of N fertilizer management practices on grain yield and N uptake of rice. The experiment was laid out in the randomized complete block design with four replications in Central China during 2008 and 2009. Five N treatments denoted as N0, N150A, N150B, N240A, and N240B, respectively, were studied. N0 represented no N application and served as a control, N150A and N150B indicated the total N application of 150 kg N ha−1 but with two different application schedules (A and B) across the early stage of rice growth. Schedule A was applied as follows: 40% basal, 30% at 10 d after transplanting (DAT) and 30% at 36 DAT (nearly at the panicle initiation stage), while schedule B was as follows: 30% at basal, 20% at 10 DAT, and 50% at 36 DAT. Similarly, N240A and N240B indicated the total N application of 240 kg N ha−1 with schedules A and B as described above. To quantify N uptake from fertilizer and soil, a 15N experiment was also conducted within the main experimental field, with micro-plots. Grain yields were significantly increased as N rates increased from 0 to 240 kg N ha−1. At the same rate, splitting N application as schedule B significantly increased the grain yield, spikelets per panicle, percentage of ripened grain, and 1 000-grain weight, compared with the N application according to schedule A. Mean rice recovery of N fertilizer by 15N tracing method ranged from 25.39% at N240A to 34.89% at N150B, however, N fertilizer residual rate in the soil ranged from 12.40% at N240A to 16.61% at N150B. About 31.5 and 28.5% of total uptake of 15N derived from basal fertilizer was absorbed at panicle initiation and heading stages, respectively. However, 65.6-92.5% of total uptake of 15N derived from topdressing fertilizer was absorbed at the heading stage. Based on yield and nitrogen recovery efficiency, splitting N application according to schedule B at the rate of 240 kg N ha−1 will be more profitable among the tested five N treatments in Central China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield rose as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
N rates increased from 0 to 240 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were significantly increased as N rates increased from 0 to 240 kg N ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Schedule B increased rice grain yield relative to schedule A.

Treatment
schedule Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
schedule Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same rate, splitting N application as schedule B significantly increased the grain yield, spikelets per panicle, percentage of ripened grain, and 1 000-grain weight, compared with the N application according to schedule A.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Schedule B increased rice spikelets per panicle relative to schedule A.

Treatment
schedule Be0
Outcome
spikelets per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
schedule Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same rate, splitting N application as schedule B significantly increased the grain yield, spikelets per panicle, percentage of ripened grain, and 1 000-grain weight, compared with the N application according to schedule A.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Schedule B increased rice percentage of ripened grain relative to schedule A.

Treatment
schedule Be0
Outcome
percentage of ripened graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
schedule Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same rate, splitting N application as schedule B significantly increased the grain yield, spikelets per panicle, percentage of ripened grain, and 1 000-grain weight, compared with the N application according to schedule A.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Schedule B increased rice 1 000-grain weight relative to schedule A.

Treatment
schedule Be0
Outcome
1 000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
schedule Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same rate, splitting N application as schedule B significantly increased the grain yield, spikelets per panicle, percentage of ripened grain, and 1 000-grain weight, compared with the N application according to schedule A.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen fertilizer recovery ranged from 25.39% at N240A to 34.89% at N150B.

Outcome
recovery of N fertilizere0
Value
25.39% at N240A to 34.89% at N150Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean rice recovery of N fertilizer by 15N tracing method ranged from 25.39% at N240A to 34.89% at N150B, however, N fertilizer residual rate in the soil ranged from 12.40% at N240A to 16.61% at N150B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil residual nitrogen fertilizer ranged from 12.40% at N240A to 16.61% at N150B.

Outcome
N fertilizer residual rate in the soile0
Value
12.40% at N240A to 16.61% at N150Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean rice recovery of N fertilizer by 15N tracing method ranged from 25.39% at N240A to 34.89% at N150B, however, N fertilizer residual rate in the soil ranged from 12.40% at N240A to 16.61% at N150B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice absorbed basal fertilizer nitrogen at panicle initiation.

Organ / stage
panicle initiatione0
Outcome
total uptake of 15N derived from basal fertilizere0
Value
31.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 31.5 and 28.5% of total uptake of 15N derived from basal fertilizer was absorbed at panicle initiation and heading stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice absorbed basal fertilizer nitrogen at heading.

Organ / stage
headinge0
Outcome
total uptake of 15N derived from basal fertilizere0
Value
28.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 31.5 and 28.5% of total uptake of 15N derived from basal fertilizer was absorbed at panicle initiation and heading stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice absorbed 65.6-92.5% of topdressing fertilizer nitrogen at heading.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Outcome
total uptake of 15N derived from topdressing fertilizere0
Value
65.6-92.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 65.6-92.5% of total uptake of 15N derived from topdressing fertilizer was absorbed at the heading stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend schedule B at 240 kg N ha−1 as most profitable among tested treatments.

Outcome
splitting N application according to schedule B at the rate of 240 kg N ha−1e0
Setting
Central Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on yield and nitrogen recovery efficiency, splitting N application according to schedule B at the rate of 240 kg N ha−1 will be more profitable among the tested five N treatments in Central China.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.