Paper · 2001 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Evaluation of row-spacing, seedbed preparation, and weed control options for dryland soybean

P. M. Manning; T. C. Keisling; M. P. Popp; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Production systems for dryland full season soybean consist of seedbed preparation, planting operations, weed control activities and harvesting operations. Often production system choices are interdependent across seedbed preparation, planting equipment and weed control options. For example, the selection of one system option such as no-till seedbed preparation restricts planting equipment choices. Evaluating production systems requires that a holistic approach be employed to account not only for agronomic factors but economic ones as well. Experiments were conducted in 1992, 1993, and 1994 at Keiser, AR and in 1992 and 1993 at Marianna, AR on clayey and silt loam soils, respectively. Treatments consisted of various combinations of preplant tillage (yes or no), row-spacing (narrow or wide), and post-plant cultivation (yes or no) for weed control. Grain yield data was collected and analyzed using SAS. In addition, economic analysis consisted of generating crop production budgets that were used to estimate returns to land, labor and management as well as to conduct breakeven and sensitivity analysis. A no-till system lead to higher grain yield and net returns on clayey soils at Keiser, AR, while the tilled system lead to more stable returns on silt loam soils at Marianna, AR. Results showed that narrow row spacing was superior regardless of soil type and location. Finally, post-plant cultivation was of little consequence given the above recommendations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased soybean grain yield on clayey soils at Keiser.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-till systeme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
clayey soilse0
Setting
Keiser, ARe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A no-till system lead to higher grain yield and net returns on clayey soils at Keiser, AR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased net returns on clayey soils at Keiser.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-till systeme0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
clayey soilse0
Setting
Keiser, ARe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A no-till system lead to higher grain yield and net returns on clayey soils at Keiser, AR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage produced more stable returns on silt loam soils at Marianna.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tilled systeme0
Outcome
returnse0
Direction
more stablee0
Qualifier
silt loam soilse0
Setting
Marianna, ARe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tilled system lead to more stable returns on silt loam soils at Marianna, AR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing was superior across soil types and locations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“narrow row spacing was superior regardless of soil type and location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-plant cultivation had little consequence given the other system recommendations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
post-plant cultivatione0
Outcome
little consequencee0
Direction
little consequencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-plant cultivation was of little consequence given the above recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.