Paper · 2008 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

The Heterotoxicity of Hordeum vulgare L. Extracts in Four Growth Stages on Germination and Seedlings Growth of Avena ludoviciana

M. Kolahi; B. Peivastega; I. Hadizade; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phytotoxicity of barley extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.) on wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu) was investigated. Water extracts five varieties of barley were bioassayed on germination and seedling growth of wild-oat to test the heterotoxicity of barley on wild-oat, study the dynamics of allelopathic potential over four growth stages and identify the most allelopathic plant part of barley in each stage. Whole barley plants were extracted at growth stage 4 (stems not developed enough), whilst for the following growth stages roots, stems, panicles and leaves were extracted separately. Seedling growth bioassays demonstrated that the wild-oat responded differently to the allelopathic potential of barley. For wild-oat radical growth and coleoptile growth were more depressed than germination, though. The allelopathic potential of barley plant parts was not stable over its life cycle for wild-oat. Leaves and stems were the most phytotoxic barley plant parts for wild-oat in the all stages. Among the varieties Eizeh appeared as the best one showing toxicity to seed germination of wild oat at its stage 4 and 8. Results suggested that the response by wild-oat varied depending on the source of allelochemicals (plant part) and the growth stage of the barley plant and kind of variety. The results leaded to conclude that Eizeh variety of barley was good to grow as it has good check on seed germination of wild oat plants as well as it also retarded the growth of root and shoot length of oat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild oat radicle and coleoptile growth were more depressed by barley extracts than germination.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
barley extractse0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
wild-oat radical growth and coleoptile growthe1
Direction
more depressede1
Comparator
germinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.) on wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“wild-oat radical growth and coleoptile growth were more depressed than germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley allelopathic potential against wild oat changed across its life cycle.

Taxon
wild oate0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
allelopathic potential of barley plant partse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.) on wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The allelopathic potential of barley plant parts was not stable over its life cycle for wild-oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley leaves and stems were the most phytotoxic parts to wild oat across stages.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
Leaves and stemse1
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
most phytotoxice1
Direction
most phytotoxice1
Comparator
barley plant partse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.) on wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves and stems were the most phytotoxic barley plant parts for wild-oat in the all stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eizeh variety was most toxic to wild oat seed germination at stages 4 and 8.

Taxon
wild oate0
Material
Eizehe1
Treatment
Eizehe1
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree2other
Outcome
toxicity to seed germination of wild oate1
Direction
beste1
Qualifier
stage 4 and 8e1
Comparator
the varietiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the varieties Eizeh appeared as the best one showing toxicity to seed germination of wild oat at its stage 4 and 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1114 · show in text ↑
e2

“barley extracts (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–53 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild oat response depended on barley plant part, stage and variety.

Taxon
wild oate0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree1other
Outcome
response by wild-oate1
Qualifier
source of allelochemicals (plant part) and the growth stage of the barley plant and kind of varietye1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“the response by wild-oat varied depending on the source of allelochemicals (plant part) and the growth stage of the barley plant and kind of variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1287 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend Eizeh barley to suppress wild oat germination and root and shoot growth.

Taxon
wild oate0
Material
Eizehe1
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree1other
Outcome
Eizeh variety of barley was good to growe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eizeh variety of barley was good to grow as it has good check on seed germination of wild oat plants as well as it also retarded the growth of root and shoot length of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1496 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.