Paper · 2015 · Weed Science

Diverse Rotations and Optimal Cultural Practices Control Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

K. Neil Harker; John T. O'Donovan; T. Kelly Turkington; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In western Canada, more money is spent on wild oat herbicides than on any other weed species, and wild oat resistance to herbicides is the most widespread resistance issue. A direct-seeded field experiment was conducted from 2010 to 2014 at eight Canadian sites to determine crop life cycle, crop species, crop seeding rate, crop usage, and herbicide rate combination effects on wild oat management and canola yield. Combining 2× seeding rates of early-cut barley silage with 2× seeding rates of winter cereals and excluding wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 yr (2011 to 2013) often led to similar wild oat density, aboveground wild oat biomass, wild oat seed density in the soil, and canola yield as a repeated canola–wheat rotation under a full wild oat herbicide rate regime. Wild oat was similarly well managed after 3 yr of perennial alfalfa without wild oat herbicides. Forgoing wild oat herbicides in only 2 of 5 yr from exclusively summer annual crop rotations resulted in higher wild oat density, biomass, and seed banks. Management systems that effectively combine diverse and optimal cultural practices against weeds, and limit herbicide use, reduce selection pressure for weed resistance to herbicides and prolong the utility of threatened herbicide tools.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining doubled seeding rates of early-cut barley silage and winter cereals with omitting wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 years often gave similar wild oat density, biomass and soil seed density as a repeated canola-wheat rotation with full herbicide rates.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
Combining 2× seeding rates of early-cut barley silage with 2× seeding rates of winter cereals and excluding wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 yr (2011 to 2013)e0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat density, aboveground wild oat biomass, wild oat seed density in the soile0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
a repeated canola–wheat rotation under a full wild oat herbicide rate regimee0

Verbatim

e0

“Combining 2× seeding rates of early-cut barley silage with 2× seeding rates of winter cereals and excluding wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 yr (2011 to 2013) often led to similar wild oat density, aboveground wild oat biomass, wild oat seed density in the soil, and canola yield as a repeated canola–wheat rotation under a full wild oat herbicide rate regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same diverse rotation without wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 years often gave canola yield similar to a repeated canola-wheat rotation with full herbicide rates.

Treatment
Combining 2× seeding rates of early-cut barley silage with 2× seeding rates of winter cereals and excluding wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 yr (2011 to 2013)e0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
canola yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
a repeated canola–wheat rotation under a full wild oat herbicide rate regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining 2× seeding rates of early-cut barley silage with 2× seeding rates of winter cereals and excluding wild oat herbicides for 3 of 5 yr (2011 to 2013) often led to similar wild oat density, aboveground wild oat biomass, wild oat seed density in the soil, and canola yield as a repeated canola–wheat rotation under a full wild oat herbicide rate regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild oat was similarly well managed after 3 years of perennial alfalfa without wild oat herbicides.

Taxon
Wild oate0
Treatment
3 yr of perennial alfalfa without wild oat herbicidese0
Outcome
well managede0
Direction
similarlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Wild oat was similarly well managed after 3 yr of perennial alfalfa without wild oat herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forgoing wild oat herbicides in only 2 of 5 years in exclusively summer annual crop rotations resulted in higher wild oat density, biomass and seed banks.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
Forgoing wild oat herbicides in only 2 of 5 yre0
Outcome
wild oat density, biomass, and seed bankse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
exclusively summer annual crop rotationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Forgoing wild oat herbicides in only 2 of 5 yr from exclusively summer annual crop rotations resulted in higher wild oat density, biomass, and seed banks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1026 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Management systems combining diverse and optimal cultural practices against weeds while limiting herbicide use reduce selection pressure for herbicide resistance.

Taxon
weedse0
Outcome
reduce selection pressure for weed resistance to herbicidese0

Verbatim

e0

“Management systems that effectively combine diverse and optimal cultural practices against weeds, and limit herbicide use, reduce selection pressure for weed resistance to herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1210 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Hordeum vulgare · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

51 papers: 32 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

processing · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

processing · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

density · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

herbicide · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

density · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 54 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.