Abstract
Synopsis Data on yield components, culm size and straw‐grain ratio, percentage composition, and accumulation of N, P, and K, and the weight and distribution of roots indicate that the greater growth and accumulation of nutrients of plants grown on plots with the narrowest row spacing distance was more likely the result of better utilization of light in photosynthesis than any difference associated with the root system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
The narrowest oat row spacing gave greater growth and nutrient accumulation.
- Taxon
- Oat
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- narrowest row spacing distancee0
- Outcome
- growth and accumulation of nutrientse0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Oat Performance”
e0“greater growth and accumulation of nutrients of plants grown on plots with the narrowest row spacing distance”
Claim · model-written summary
The greater growth of oat at narrow row spacing is more likely due to better light utilization in photosynthesis than to the root system.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- growth and accumulation of nutrientse0
- Qualifier
- better utilization of light in photosynthesise1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Oat Performance”
e0“greater growth and accumulation of nutrients of plants grown on plots with the narrowest row spacing distance”
e1“was more likely the result of better utilization of light in photosynthesis than any difference associated with the root system”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.