Paper · 2025 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Sunflower Residues on Yield Characteristics and Associated Weeds of Oat Varieties

Rehab Mohammed Hassan; Saddam Hussein Abbas; Hameed Abd Khashan Al-Farttoosi

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted during the 2023–2024 agricultural season at the University of Al-Qasim Green to assess the response of oat varieties to sunflower residues and their effects on yield, yield components, and associated weeds. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a split-plot arrangement, testing three oat varieties (Karlob, Genzania, Shifa) and three sunflower residue treatments (Control, residues, and fermented residues). Statistical analysis revealed that the Shifa variety had the lowest average weed density and dry weight (27.89, 28.55, 29.44 plants m⁻ 2 and 11.68 g m⁻ 2 ) across the study, compared to Karlob, which recorded the highest weed density. Genzania showed the highest weed dry weight (13.54 g m⁻ 2 ) but excelled in panicle count (351.00 panicles m⁻ 2 ). Karlob achieved the highest grain count per panicle and 1000-grain weight (45.333 grains panicle⁻¹, 30.569 g), while Shifa produced the highest overall grain yield (4.318 tons ha⁻¹). The addition of fermented sunflower residues significantly reduced weed density (14.33, 13.00, 13.89 plants m⁻ 2 ) and dry weight (4.65 g m⁻ 2 ). Residues also enhanced yield components, resulting in the highest panicle number (336.22 panicles m⁻ 2 ), grains per panicle (44.69 grains panicle⁻¹), 1000-grain weight (30.059 g), and grain yield (4.503 tons ha⁻¹). In conclusion, Shifa was the most resilient to allelopathic effects and displayed strong competitive ability, maintaining consistent yield advantages across treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Shifa had the lowest average weed density (27.89, 28.55, 29.44 plants m-2).

Material
Shifae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
27.89, 28.55, 29.44 plants m⁻ 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Shifa variety had the lowest average weed density and dry weight (27.89, 28.55, 29.44 plants m⁻ 2 and 11.68 g m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Shifa had the lowest average weed dry weight (11.68 g m-2).

Material
Shifae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.68 g m⁻ 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Shifa variety had the lowest average weed density and dry weight (27.89, 28.55, 29.44 plants m⁻ 2 and 11.68 g m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Karlob recorded the highest weed density.

Material
Karlobe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to Karlob, which recorded the highest weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Genzania showed the highest weed dry weight (13.54 g m-2).

Material
Genzaniae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.54 g m⁻ 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genzania showed the highest weed dry weight (13.54 g m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Genzania excelled in panicle count (351.00 panicles m-2).

Material
Genzaniae0
Outcome
panicle counte0
Direction
excellede0
Value
351.00 panicles m⁻ 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genzania showed the highest weed dry weight (13.54 g m⁻ 2 ) but excelled in panicle count (351.00 panicles m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Karlob achieved the highest grain count per panicle (45.333 grains per panicle).

Material
Karlobe0
Outcome
grain count per paniclee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.333 grains panicle⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karlob achieved the highest grain count per panicle and 1000-grain weight (45.333 grains panicle⁻¹, 30.569 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Karlob achieved the highest 1000-grain weight (30.569 g).

Material
Karlobe0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.569 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karlob achieved the highest grain count per panicle and 1000-grain weight (45.333 grains panicle⁻¹, 30.569 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat variety Shifa produced the highest overall grain yield (4.318 tons per ha).

Material
Shifae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.318 tons ha⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shifa produced the highest overall grain yield (4.318 tons ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding fermented sunflower residues significantly reduced weed density in oat (14.33, 13.00, 13.89 plants m-2).

Treatment
fermented sunflower residuese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.33, 13.00, 13.89 plants m⁻ 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of fermented sunflower residues significantly reduced weed density (14.33, 13.00, 13.89 plants m⁻ 2 ) and dry weight (4.65 g m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding fermented sunflower residues significantly reduced weed dry weight in oat (4.65 g m-2).

Treatment
fermented sunflower residuese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.65 g m⁻ 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of fermented sunflower residues significantly reduced weed density (14.33, 13.00, 13.89 plants m⁻ 2 ) and dry weight (4.65 g m⁻ 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower residues gave the highest panicle number in oat (336.22 panicles m-2).

Treatment
Residuese0
Outcome
panicle numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
336.22 panicles m⁻ 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues also enhanced yield components, resulting in the highest panicle number (336.22 panicles m⁻ 2 ), grains per panicle (44.69 grains panicle⁻¹), 1000-grain weight (30.059 g), and grain yield (4.503 tons ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower residues gave the highest grains per panicle in oat (44.69 grains per panicle).

Treatment
Residuese0
Outcome
grains per paniclee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44.69 grains panicle⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues also enhanced yield components, resulting in the highest panicle number (336.22 panicles m⁻ 2 ), grains per panicle (44.69 grains panicle⁻¹), 1000-grain weight (30.059 g), and grain yield (4.503 tons ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower residues gave the highest 1000-grain weight in oat (30.059 g).

Treatment
Residuese0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.059 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues also enhanced yield components, resulting in the highest panicle number (336.22 panicles m⁻ 2 ), grains per panicle (44.69 grains panicle⁻¹), 1000-grain weight (30.059 g), and grain yield (4.503 tons ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower residues gave the highest grain yield in oat (4.503 tons per ha).

Treatment
Residuese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.503 tons ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues also enhanced yield components, resulting in the highest panicle number (336.22 panicles m⁻ 2 ), grains per panicle (44.69 grains panicle⁻¹), 1000-grain weight (30.059 g), and grain yield (4.503 tons ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Shifa was the most resilient oat variety to allelopathic effects and showed strong competitive ability, keeping consistent yield advantages across treatments.

Material
Shifae0
Outcome
most resilient to allelopathic effectse0
Direction
most resiliente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shifa was the most resilient to allelopathic effects and displayed strong competitive ability, maintaining consistent yield advantages across treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.