By interacting organism › Plants › Brassicaceae › Brassica napus var. napus

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola intercropping increased fine-root production by apple trees at greater depths.

Taxon: apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment: intercropping of canola at different densitiese1
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse1weed
Outcome: fine rootse0
Direction: moree0
Qualifier: greater depthse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“caused apple trees to produce more fine roots at greater depths.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1129

e1
“intercropping of canola at different densities”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–888

Title

Redesign of dryland apple orchards by intercropping the bioenergy crop canola (Brassica napus L.): Achieving sustainable intensification

Xiaodong Gao; Nana He; Ruhao Jia; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2021. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12916

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Canola introduction increased apple fruit quality to varying degrees.
Intervention effect Canola introduction did not measurably affect apple yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola introduction increased apple fruit quality to varying degrees.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticae0
Treatment: Introduction of canolae1
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse1weed
Outcome: quality of apple fruite0
Direction: increasede0
Qualifier: to varying degreese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“increased the quality of apple fruit to varying degrees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1479

e1
“Introduction of canola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1303

e2
“dryland apple orchards”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–34

Title

Redesign of dryland apple orchards by intercropping the bioenergy crop canola (Brassica napus L.): Achieving sustainable intensification

Xiaodong Gao; Nana He; Ruhao Jia; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2021. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12916

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Canola intercropping increased fine-root production by apple trees at greater depths.
Intervention effect Canola introduction did not measurably affect apple yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola introduction did not measurably affect apple yield.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticae0
Treatment: Introduction of canolae1
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse1weed
Outcome: apple yielde0
Direction: not affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“not affecting apple yield measurably”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1522

e1
“Introduction of canola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1303

Title

Redesign of dryland apple orchards by intercropping the bioenergy crop canola (Brassica napus L.): Achieving sustainable intensification

Xiaodong Gao; Nana He; Ruhao Jia; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2021. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12916

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Canola intercropping increased fine-root production by apple trees at greater depths.
Intervention effect Canola introduction increased apple fruit quality to varying degrees.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola leachate reduced wheat dry mass by 52%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: canolae0
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0other
Outcome: Wheat dry mass productione0
Direction: reducede0
Value: -52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Wheat dry mass production was reduced by aboveground leachates from barley (-32%), canola (-52%), alfalfa (-76%) and ryegrass (-54%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–929

Title

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ALLELOPATHC EFFECTS OF ROOT AND PLANT RESIDUE LEACHATES ON ROTATIONAL CROPS AND RYEGRASS

Michael Ignatius Ferreira; Carl Frederick Reinhardt; Marieta van der Rijst International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Bioresearch 2021. doi:10.35410/ijaeb.2021.5673

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Alfalfa root leachate reduced barley height by 18% at three weeks and 17% at five weeks.
Intervention effect Medic root leachate reduced barley height by 10% at three weeks and 9% at five weeks.
Intervention effect Barley leachate reduced wheat dry mass by 32%.
Intervention effect Alfalfa leachate reduced wheat dry mass by 76%.
Intervention effect Ryegrass leachate reduced wheat dry mass by 54%.
Intervention effect Alfalfa root leachate reduced ryegrass height by 16% at three weeks.
Mechanism Lupine, alfalfa and medic may contain allelochemicals responsible for growth and biomass effects.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

East Tennessee canola extract reduced soybean seed germination by 28% relative to deionized water.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: canola extracte0
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0other
Outcome: seed germinatione0
Direction: suppressede0
Value: 28%e0
Comparator: deionized watere0
Setting: East Tennesseee0

Verbatim

e0
“the application of canola extract (East Tennessee) suppressed soybean seed germination the most (28%) compared to deionized water”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1451

Title

Allelopathic Impact of Cover Crop Species on Soybean and Goosegrass Seedling Germination and Early Growth

Kendall Sheldon; Sam Purdom; Avat Shekoofa; et al. Agriculture 2021. doi:10.3390/agriculture11100965

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Most cover crop leachates significantly reduced soybean seedling root length.
Intervention effect Wheat cover crop leachate significantly reduced goosegrass seedling root length.
Intervention effect Wheat extract significantly increased soybean root nodulation relative to deionized water.
Observation Wheat leachate had the strongest reported allelopathic impact on goosegrass germination and growth.
Observation Wheat leachate had the lowest observed adverse effect on soybean.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments except the glyphosate-treated control reduced aboveground canola biomass by an average of 96%.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: All treatmentse2
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse2weed
Outcome: aboveground canola biomasse2
Direction: reducede2
Value: 96%e2
Comparator: glyphosate-treated controle2

Verbatim

t0
“Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110

e2
“All treatments with the exception of the glyphosate-treated control reduced aboveground canola biomass by an average of 96%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–794

Title

Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean

Allyson Mierau; Moria E. Kurtenbach; Eric N. Johnson; et al. Weed Technology 2020. doi:10.1017/wet.2020.2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A PRE and POST herbicide used together reduced canola seed contamination from 36% to less than 5%.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: PRE and POST herbicidee3
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse3weed
Outcome: canola seed contaminatione3
Direction: reducede3
Value: less than 5%e3
Comparator: from 36%e3

Verbatim

t0
“Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110

e3
“canola seed contamination was reduced from 36% to less than 5% when a PRE and POST herbicide were both used”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–912

Title

Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean

Allyson Mierau; Moria E. Kurtenbach; Eric N. Johnson; et al. Weed Technology 2020. doi:10.1017/wet.2020.2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen other cultivars sustained nematodes to varying degrees without multiplication.

Taxon: Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0host
Second interactor: chickpeaCicer arietinume0host
Outcome: sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplicatione0
Value: 13e0
Qualifier: canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomatoe0

Verbatim

e0
“13 cultivars including canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomato, sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplication”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–786

t0
“Pratylenchus curvicauda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56

Title

Assessment of the pest status of Pratylenchus curvicauda and ultrastructural changes in roots of infected wheat and barley

Farhana Begum; Michael G. K. Jones; John Fosu‐Nyarko Plant Pathology 2020. doi:10.1111/ppa.13232

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-canola extract reduced white oat germination.

Taxon: white oate0
Treatment: Aqueous extract of the whole canola plante0
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0weed
Outcome: germinatione0
Direction: reducede0
Qualifier: mainly in high concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Aqueous extract of the whole canola plant reduced the germination and increased abnormal seedlings of white oat and wheat, mainly in high concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–970

Title

Growth and yield parameters of white oat and wheat as affected by canola residues

Samuel Luiz Fioreze; Jonathan Vacari; Thais Lemos Turek; et al. Revista CERES 2019. doi:10.1590/0034-737x201966060002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Whole-canola extract reduced wheat germination.
Intervention effect Whole-canola extract increased abnormal white oat seedlings.
Intervention effect Whole-canola extract increased abnormal wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect Canola residues did not affect white oat emergence, growth or grain yield.
Intervention effect Canola residues lowered wheat emergence.
Intervention effect Canola residues did not affect wheat growth or yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-canola extract reduced wheat germination.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Aqueous extract of the whole canola plante0
Interactor: canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0weed
Outcome: germinatione0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Aqueous extract of the whole canola plant reduced the germination and increased abnormal seedlings of white oat and wheat, mainly in high concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–970

Title

Growth and yield parameters of white oat and wheat as affected by canola residues

Samuel Luiz Fioreze; Jonathan Vacari; Thais Lemos Turek; et al. Revista CERES 2019. doi:10.1590/0034-737x201966060002

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Whole-canola extract reduced white oat germination.
Intervention effect Whole-canola extract increased abnormal white oat seedlings.
Intervention effect Whole-canola extract increased abnormal wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect Canola residues did not affect white oat emergence, growth or grain yield.
Intervention effect Canola residues lowered wheat emergence.
Intervention effect Canola residues did not affect wheat growth or yield.

Brassica napus var. napus 79 claims

79 claims