Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Allelopathic Impact of Cover Crop Species on Soybean and Goosegrass Seedling Germination and Early Growth

Kendall Sheldon; Sam Purdom; Avat Shekoofa; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cover crops can provide a variety of benefits to an agricultural system: weed suppression, soil quality improvement, and soil water infiltration. Although there is ample research documenting weed suppression from cover crops, the mechanics of the suppression are not implicitly understood. Along with the aforementioned positive attributes, negative allelopathic effects on row crops planted into cover crop systems have been documented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the allelopathic potential of certain cover crop species on soybean (Glycine max L.) and goosegrass (Eleusine indica L.) germination and early seedling growth under controlled environments in petri dish and pot experiments. Leachates from above-ground biomass of five cover crop species, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cereal rye (Secale cereale), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), and canola (Brassica napus L.), from two locations (East and Middle Tennessee) were extracted and applied at 0 (water) and 50 v/v. In experiment I, both soybean and goosegrass seeds were examined, and, in experiment II, only soybean seeds were examined under the application of cover crop leachates. Most cover crop leachates from both locations significantly reduced the soybean seedling root length (p < 0.01). Overall, the application of canola extract (East Tennessee) suppressed soybean seed germination the most (28%) compared to deionized water. For goosegrass, the wheat cover crop leachate significantly reduced seedling root length (p < 0.01). In experiment II, the soybean root nodulation was significantly increased with the wheat extract treatment compared to deionized water. While the results indicate that the location and environment may change cover crop species allelopathic potential, the wheat cover crop leachate had the most potent allelopathic impact on goosegrass germination and growth; however, had the lowest observed adverse effect on our tested row crop, soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most cover crop leachates significantly reduced soybean seedling root length.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
cover crop leachatese0
Outcome
seedling root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
both locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most cover crop leachates from both locations significantly reduced the soybean seedling root length (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

East Tennessee canola extract reduced soybean seed germination by 28% relative to deionized water.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
canola extracte0
Interactor
canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0other
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
deionized watere0
Setting
East Tennesseee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Interactorcontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of canola extract (East Tennessee) suppressed soybean seed germination the most (28%) compared to deionized water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cover crop leachate significantly reduced goosegrass seedling root length.

Taxon
goosegrasse0
Treatment
wheat cover crop leachatee0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
seedling root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For goosegrass, the wheat cover crop leachate significantly reduced seedling root length (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat extract significantly increased soybean root nodulation relative to deionized water.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
wheat extract treatmente0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
root nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
deionized watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soybean root nodulation was significantly increased with the wheat extract treatment compared to deionized water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1688 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leachate had the strongest reported allelopathic impact on goosegrass germination and growth.

Taxon
goosegrasse0
Treatment
wheat cover crop leachatee0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
germination and growthe0
Direction
most potente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the wheat cover crop leachate had the most potent allelopathic impact on goosegrass germination and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leachate had the lowest observed adverse effect on soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
adverse effecte0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had the lowest observed adverse effect on our tested row crop, soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–1992 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus var. napus · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Triticum aestivum · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cover crop · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 9 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

botanical · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 79 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.