Paper · 2020 · Plant Pathology

Assessment of the pest status of Pratylenchus curvicauda and ultrastructural changes in roots of infected wheat and barley

Farhana Begum; Michael G. K. Jones; John Fosu‐Nyarko

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Pratylenchus curvicauda , which was first described in metropolitan Perth in 1991, was recently identified in grain‐growing areas in Western Australia. The biology of this root‐lesion nematode, and especially its pest status, is unknown. We investigated its life cycle and interaction with host plants, because such information is essential for its management. The life cycle took 45 days to complete in a wheat cultivar maintained at 23°C. Over 10 weeks, the nematode multiplied in 26 of 61 genotypes; these host plants were all cereals and included widely grown cultivars of wheat and barley. Eighteen other cereal genotypes and 13 cultivars including canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomato, sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplication. Four cover crops were not suitable hosts. The patterns of attraction of the nematodes and penetration into roots of the host and tolerant plants were similar. The nonhosts attracted fewer nematodes, none of which penetrated the roots. Browning of infected roots was atypical—it occurred late in some roots, 55 days after inoculation, and in the presence of a fungus. The nematodes were confined to, and fed from, cortical cells. The ultrastructure of infected wheat and barley cells showed typical signs of damage caused by Pratylenchus spp. and included cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasm, hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granules. This detailed characterization of P . curvicauda– host interaction indicates the nematode is likely to be a pest of major crops, and attention should be given to its management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematode completed its life cycle in 45 days in wheat at 23°C.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0host
Outcome
life cyclee0
Value
45 dayse0
Qualifier
23°Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The life cycle took 45 days to complete in a wheat cultivar maintained at 23°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematode multiplied in 26 of 61 cereal genotypes over ten weeks.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Interactor
cerealse0host
Outcome
multipliede0
Value
26 of 61e0
Qualifier
Over 10 weekse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Over 10 weeks, the nematode multiplied in 26 of 61 genotypes; these host plants were all cereals and included widely grown cultivars of wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other tested cereal genotypes sustained nematodes without multiplication.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Material
cereal genotypese0
Interactor
cereale0host
Outcome
sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplicatione0
Value
Eighteene0

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen other cereal genotypes and 13 cultivars including canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomato, sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen other cultivars sustained nematodes to varying degrees without multiplication.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Interactor
canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0host
Second interactor
chickpeaCicer arietinume0host
Outcome
sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplicatione0
Value
13e0
Qualifier
canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Interactorcontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · Second interactorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13 cultivars including canola, chickpea, ryegrass, lupin, soybean, and tomato, sustained the nematodes to different degrees without multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four cover crops were unsuitable hosts.

Taxon
cover cropse0
Interactor
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0pathogen
Outcome
not suitable hostse0
Value
Foure0

Verbatim

e0

“Four cover crops were not suitable hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attraction and root penetration patterns were similar in host and tolerant plants.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Outcome
attraction of the nematodes and penetration into rootse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
host and tolerant plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“The patterns of attraction of the nematodes and penetration into roots of the host and tolerant plants were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonhosts attracted fewer nematodes and none penetrated roots.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Outcome
attracted fewer nematodes, none of which penetrated the rootse0
Direction
fewere0
Qualifier
nonhostse0

Verbatim

e0

“The nonhosts attracted fewer nematodes, none of which penetrated the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some infected roots browned late, 55 days after inoculation, with a fungus present.

Interactor
funguse0other
Outcome
Browning of infected rootse0
Value
55 dayse0
Qualifier
late in some rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browning of infected roots was atypical—it occurred late in some roots, 55 days after inoculation, and in the presence of a fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes were confined to cortical cells and fed from them.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Outcome
confined to, and fed from, cortical cellse0

Verbatim

e0

“The nematodes were confined to, and fed from, cortical cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected wheat cells showed disorganization, membrane integrity loss and cytoplasm disintegration.

Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ultrastructure of infected wheat and barley cells showed typical signs of damage caused by Pratylenchus spp. and included cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasm, hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1491 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected barley cells showed disorganization, membrane integrity loss and cytoplasm disintegration.

Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ultrastructure of infected wheat and barley cells showed typical signs of damage caused by Pratylenchus spp. and included cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasm, hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1491 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected wheat cells showed nuclear hypertrophy and tannin-like granule deposition.

Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ultrastructure of infected wheat and barley cells showed typical signs of damage caused by Pratylenchus spp. and included cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasm, hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1491 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected barley cells showed nuclear hypertrophy and tannin-like granule deposition.

Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ultrastructure of infected wheat and barley cells showed typical signs of damage caused by Pratylenchus spp. and included cell disorganization and lack of membrane integrity, disintegration of cytoplasm, hypertrophy of some nuclei, and deposition of tannin‐like granules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1491 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The nematode is likely a pest of major crops and merits management attention.

Taxon
Pratylenchus curvicaudaPratylenchus curvicaudat0
Outcome
attention should be given to its managemente0
Qualifier
likely to be a pest of major cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“the nematode is likely to be a pest of major crops, and attention should be given to its management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus curvicauda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑