Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Effect of Mulching on Soil Temperature and Moisture Regime on Emergence, Growth and Yield of White Yam in a Tropical Wet-and-Dry Climate

Eruola A. O; Bello N. J; Ufoegbune G. C; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An on-farm yam experiment was conducted to study the effect of mulching on soil temperature and moisture regime on white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) growth and yield in Abeokuta, South-western Nigeria. Three mulching options (grass mulched, polythene mulched and unmulched) was selected and related to crop growth and yield. Grass mulch significantly (P < 0.05) lowered maximum soil temperature by 1-2℃ at 15cm depth during the thermal critical period (January - March). This led to higher rate of emergence which accounted for 28 and 46% to the polythene mulch and the unmulched plots respectively. Furthermore, grass mulch had tuber yield of about 4-6 tonnes ha-1 season-1 greater than the polythene mulch and the unmulched plots. Irrespective of mulching materials, it was found that mulching significantly (P< 0.05) increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 than the unmulched. The effect of grass mulch over nylon mulch on yam performance in the study was also discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch gave tuber yield about 4-6 tonnes ha-1 season-1 greater than polythene mulch and unmulched plots.

Treatment
grass mulche1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Value
4-6 tonnes ha-1 season-1e1
Comparator
the polythene mulch and the unmulched plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata · TaxonDorcas Atule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) growth and yield in Abeokuta, South-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“grass mulch had tuber yield of about 4-6 tonnes ha-1 season-1 greater than the polythene mulch and the unmulched plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching significantly increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 compared with unmulched plots, irrespective of mulch material.

Treatment
mulchinge1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1e1
Qualifier
Irrespective of mulching materialse1
Comparator
unmulchede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata · TaxonDorcas Atule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) growth and yield in Abeokuta, South-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrespective of mulching materials, it was found that mulching significantly (P< 0.05) increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 than the unmulched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–892 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Dioscorea cayenensis (yellow yam)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.