Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mulching significantly increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 compared with unmulched plots, irrespective of mulch material.

A claim from Effect of Mulching on Soil Temperature and Moisture Regime on Emergence, Growth and Yield of White Yam in a Tropical Wet-and-Dry Climate · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching significantly increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 compared with unmulched plots, irrespective of mulch material.

Treatment
mulchinge1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1e1
Qualifier
Irrespective of mulching materialse1
Comparator
unmulchede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata · TaxonDorcas Atule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) growth and yield in Abeokuta, South-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–198
e1

“Irrespective of mulching materials, it was found that mulching significantly (P< 0.05) increased tuber yield by about 6-8 tonnes ha-1 season-1 than the unmulched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–892

Title

Effect of Mulching on Soil Temperature and Moisture Regime on Emergence, Growth and Yield of White Yam in a Tropical Wet-and-Dry Climate

Eruola A. O; Bello N. J; Ufoegbune G. C; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2012. doi:10.5923/j.ijaf.20120201.15

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-9668682dc87fc0404bfd7e84ee526996d0a20ce24d65ee6abcbae1ca95fd99bd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Dioscorea cayenensis (yellow yam)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.