Paper · 1992 · Experimental Agriculture

Competitive Effects of a Short Duration, Bush Type Cowpea When Intercropped With Cotton in Zimbabwe

M. Natarajan; D. M. Naik

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Cowpea is an important supplement to the staple diet of maize in Zimbabwe, but its productivity is poor beacuse of pest infestations. This paper reports the results of experiments conducted over two crop seasons on the feasibility of producing a grain crop of cowpea intercropped with cotton to take advantage of cotton's slow initial growth and of drift from insecticides applied to it. Intercropping reduced the yield of cotton by between 11.5 and 73% depending on the type of season and the treatments applied, but the reduction was compensated by the yield of cowpea. The yield reduction was greater in the drier first season and with simultaneous planting of the two crops. Cowpea consistently performed better as an intercrop than as a sole crop, mainly because of the protection it received from the insecticides applied to the cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced cotton yield by 11.5 to 73%.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
reducede0
Value
between 11.5 and 73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced the yield of cotton by between 11.5 and 73% depending on the type of season and the treatments applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield compensated for the cotton yield reduction.

Outcome
yield of cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction was compensated by the yield of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–578 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield reduction was greater in the drier first season.

Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
drier first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction was greater in the drier first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield reduction was greater with simultaneous planting.

Treatment
simultaneous planting of the two cropse0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction was greater in the drier first season and with simultaneous planting of the two crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea performed better as an intercrop than as a sole crop.

Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea consistently performed better as an intercrop than as a sole crop, mainly because of the protection it received from the insecticides applied to the cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–850 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.