Paper · 2007 · Agronomy Journal

Sorghum Management Practices Suited to Varying Irrigation Strategies: A Simulation Analysis

R. L. Baumhardt; J. A. Tolk; T. A. Howell; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in regions like the Southern High Plains of Texas are requiring producers to adapt cropping practices for use with irrigation levels that vary between complete replacement of crop evapotranspiration (ET) to none (i.e., dryland production). Grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a crop suited to both dryland and various deficit irrigation production systems. Our objectives were to (i) identify cultural practices (planting date, population, and cultivar maturity) that maximize sorghum grain yield for widely varying irrigation strategies; and (ii) consider effective means to allocate available water among irrigation strategies that maximizes the ratio of yield to ET, that is, water use efficiency (WUE). Using the model SORKAM and long‐term (1958–1999) weather records from Bushland, TX, we simulated sorghum grain yields on a Pullman soil (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) under dryland (rain) and three deficit irrigation levels (rain + irrigation = 2.5, 3.75, or 5.0 mm d −1 ) for all combinations of planting date (mid‐May, 15 May; early June, 5 June; and late June, 25 June), cultivar maturity (early, 95 d; medium, 105 d; late, 120 d), and plant density (12 and 16 plants m −2 ). For 2.5 mm d −1 irrigation level, simulated grain yields were maximized with either early or medium‐maturing cultivars planted in early June. In contrast, simulated sorghum yield and WUE increased with a mid‐May planting date and later‐maturing cultivars for irrigation levels of 3.75 and 5.0 mm d −1 . We conclude that spreading water to uniformly irrigate a field with 2.5 mm d −1 produces ∼16% less grain than concentrating the same water resources to variably irrigate a field at 3.75 or 5.0 mm d −1 with complementary (2:1 and 1:1) dryland areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated grain yield at 2.5 mm/d irrigation was maximized with early or medium-maturing sorghum cultivars planted in early June.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
planted in early Junee1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
maximizede1
Qualifier
For 2.5 mm d −1 irrigation levele1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For 2.5 mm d −1 irrigation level, simulated grain yields were maximized with either early or medium‐maturing cultivars planted in early June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1419 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a crop suited to both dryland and various deficit irrigation production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated sorghum yield and WUE increased with a mid-May planting date and later-maturing cultivars at 3.75 and 5.0 mm/d irrigation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
mid‐May planting date and later‐maturing cultivarse2
Outcome
yield and WUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
for irrigation levels of 3.75 and 5.0 mm d −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In contrast, simulated sorghum yield and WUE increased with a mid‐May planting date and later‐maturing cultivars for irrigation levels of 3.75 and 5.0 mm d −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1579 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a crop suited to both dryland and various deficit irrigation production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Spreading water to uniformly irrigate at 2.5 mm/d produces about 16% less grain than concentrating the same water on variably irrigated areas.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
spreading water to uniformly irrigate a field with 2.5 mm d −1e3
Outcome
graine3
Direction
lesse3
Value
∼16%e3
Comparator
concentrating the same water resources to variably irrigate a fielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“We conclude that spreading water to uniformly irrigate a field with 2.5 mm d −1 produces ∼16% less grain than concentrating the same water resources to variably irrigate a field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1759 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a crop suited to both dryland and various deficit irrigation production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

45 papers: 28 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sowing time · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sowing time · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.