Paper · 2011 · Plant Disease

Optimum Timing of Preplant Applications of Glyphosate to Manage Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley

E. M. Babiker; S. H. Hulbert; K. L. Schroeder; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rhizoctonia root rot, caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 and R. oryzae, is considered one of the main deterrents for farmers to adopt reduced-tillage systems in the Pacific Northwest. Because of the wide host range of Rhizoctonia spp., herbicide application before planting to control weeds and volunteer plants is the main management strategy for this disease. To determine the effect of timing of glyphosate applications on the severity of Rhizoctonia root rot of barley, field experiments were conducted in 2007, 2008, and 2009 in a field naturally infested with a high level of both R. solani and R. oryzae. Crop volunteer plants and weeds were allowed to grow over the winter and plots were sprayed with glyphosate at 42, 28, 14, 7, and 2 days prior to planting. As the herbicide application interval increased, there were significant increases in shoot length, length of the first true leaf, and number of healthy seminal roots and a decrease in disease severity. Yield and the number of seminal roots did not show a response to herbicide application interval in most years. The activity of R. solani, as measured by toothpick bioassay and real-time polymerase chain reaction, declined over time in all treatments after planting barley. The herbicide application interval required to meet 80 and 90% of the maximum response (asymptote) for all plant and disease measurements ranged from 11 to 27 days and 13 to 37 days, respectively. These times are the minimum herbicide application intervals required to reduce disease severity in the following crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

As the glyphosate application interval before planting increased, shoot length, length of the first true leaf and number of healthy seminal roots of barley increased significantly.

Treatment
herbicide application intervale0
Outcome
shoot length, length of the first true leaf, and number of healthy seminal rootse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the herbicide application interval increased, there were significant increases in shoot length, length of the first true leaf, and number of healthy seminal roots and a decrease in disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

As the glyphosate application interval before planting increased, Rhizoctonia disease severity decreased significantly.

Treatment
herbicide application intervale0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniat0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the herbicide application interval increased, there were significant increases in shoot length, length of the first true leaf, and number of healthy seminal roots and a decrease in disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and the number of seminal roots did not respond to herbicide application interval in most years.

Treatment
herbicide application intervale0
Outcome
Yield and the number of seminal rootse0
Direction
did not show a responsee0
Qualifier
in most yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and the number of seminal roots did not show a response to herbicide application interval in most years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The activity of R. solani, measured by toothpick bioassay and real-time PCR, declined over time in all treatments after planting barley.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
activity of R. solanie0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of R. solani, as measured by toothpick bioassay and real-time polymerase chain reaction, declined over time in all treatments after planting barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide application interval required to reach 80% of the maximum response for all plant and disease measurements ranged from 11 to 27 days.

Outcome
herbicide application interval requirede0
Value
11 to 27 dayse0
Qualifier
80 and 90% of the maximum response (asymptote)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide application interval required to meet 80 and 90% of the maximum response (asymptote) for all plant and disease measurements ranged from 11 to 27 days and 13 to 37 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide application interval required to reach 90% of the maximum response for all plant and disease measurements ranged from 13 to 37 days.

Outcome
herbicide application interval requirede0
Value
13 to 37 dayse0
Qualifier
80 and 90% of the maximum response (asymptote)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide application interval required to meet 80 and 90% of the maximum response (asymptote) for all plant and disease measurements ranged from 11 to 27 days and 13 to 37 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These intervals are the minimum glyphosate application intervals required to reduce disease severity in the following barley crop.

Outcome
minimum herbicide application intervals required to reduce disease severitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These times are the minimum herbicide application intervals required to reduce disease severity in the following crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia Root Rot in Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–94 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · Rhizoctonia · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 8 positive, 14 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.