Paper · 1966 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Grain Sorghum to Seedbed Compaction1

S. Dasberg; D. Hillel; I. Arnon

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Various degrees of compaction were carried out prior to and immediately after planting a summer crop of sorghum under conditions of dryland farming. Soil physical properties—bulk density, penetrability, air permeability and surface cracking—were affected appreciably only to a depth of 15 cm. Preplanting compaction significantly reduced seedling emergence and yields. Postplanting treatments increased sorghum stand density and yield significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction affected soil physical properties to 15 cm depth.

Outcome
Soil physical propertiese0
Value
15 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil physical properties—bulk density, penetrability, air permeability and surface cracking—were affected appreciably only to a depth of 15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplanting compaction significantly reduced sorghum seedling emergence.

Treatment
Preplanting compactione0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preplanting compaction significantly reduced seedling emergence and yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplanting compaction significantly reduced sorghum yields.

Treatment
Preplanting compactione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preplanting compaction significantly reduced seedling emergence and yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postplanting treatments significantly increased sorghum stand density.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Postplanting treatmentse0
Outcome
stand densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postplanting treatments increased sorghum stand density and yield significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postplanting treatments significantly increased sorghum yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Postplanting treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postplanting treatments increased sorghum stand density and yield significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–458 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.