Abstract
Salinity stress induces higher levels of ethylene in plants in arid and semi-arid regions. This increased concentration of ethylene can be inhibited by using plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC-deaminase. A pot trial was conducted under salt-stressed conditions to evaluate the potential of combined application of Rhizobium phaseoli (M6 and M9), and PGPR ( Pseudomonas syringae , Mk1; Pseudomonas fluorescens , Mk20 and Pseudomonas fluorescens Biotype G, Mk25) to improve the productivity of mung bean. The results showed that salinity stress decreased significantly mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameters but inoculation with either rhizobia or PGPR alone enhanced these parameters significantly. However, the combined application of rhizobia and PGPR was more effective for reducing the depressing effect of salinity on mung bean. Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control. The results imply that combined application of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas strains can improve the productivity of mung bean. Thus, these strains could be evaluated in intensive field trials for developing biofertilizers to improve the productivity of mung bean under salt-affected conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly reduced mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameters.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- salinity stresse0
- Outcome
- mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameterse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“salinity stress decreased significantly mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobial inoculation significantly enhanced mung bean growth, yield and physiology under salt stress.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- inoculation with either rhizobia or PGPR alonee0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae0symbiont
- Outcome
- mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameterse1
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with either rhizobia or PGPR alone enhanced these parameters significantly”
e1“salinity stress decreased significantly mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculation significantly enhanced mung bean growth, yield and physiology under salt stress.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- PGPR alonee0
- Interactor
- PGPRe0symbiont
- Outcome
- mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameterse1
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with either rhizobia or PGPR alone enhanced these parameters significantly”
e1“salinity stress decreased significantly mung bean growth, yield and physiological parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined rhizobia and PGPR reduced the depressing effect of salinity more than either alone.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- combined application of rhizobia and PGPRe0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe0symbiont
- Outcome
- depressing effect of salinity on mung beane0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combined application of rhizobia and PGPR was more effective for reducing the depressing effect of salinity on mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised shoot fresh weight by 145% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- shoot fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 145%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised root fresh weight by 173% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 173%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised pod number by 150% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- number of pods plant −1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 150%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised pod fresh weight by 182% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- pod fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 182%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised total dry matter by 269% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- total dry mattere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 269%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised relative water content by 19% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- relative water contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 19%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised water use efficiency by 51% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 51%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised leaf potassium concentration by 33% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- potassium concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 33%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised leaf sodium concentration by 56% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- sodium concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 56%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation raised grain nitrogen concentration by 99% versus uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen concentration in grains of mung beane0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 99%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Co-inoculation increased the shoot fresh weight (145%), root fresh weight (173%), number of pods plant −1 (150%), pod fresh weight (182%), total dry matter (269%), relative water content (19%), water use efficiency (51%), potassium concentration in leaves (33%), sodium concentration in leaves (56%) and nitrogen concentration in grains of mung bean (99%), compared with the uninoculated control.”
e1“combined application of rhizobia and PGPR”
Claim · model-written summary
The strains should be evaluated in intensive field trials as potential biofertilizers for salt-affected mung bean production.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Outcome
- evaluated in intensive field trials for developing biofertilizerse0
- Qualifier
- under salt-affected conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these strains could be evaluated in intensive field trials for developing biofertilizers to improve the productivity of mung bean under salt-affected conditions”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →inoculation · organism · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.